Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39234626›Full record

SynthesisNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2025

What is the Relationship Between Raising the Minimum Legal Sales Age of Tobacco Above 20 and Cigarette Smoking? A Systematic Review.

Nathan Davies, Ilze Bogdanovica, Shaun McGill, Rachael L Murray

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Perceptions of Children and Young People in England on the Smokefree Generation Policy: A Focus Group Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nathan DaviesNottingham Centre for Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9112-6471
Ilze BogdanovicaNottingham Centre for Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK and SPECTRUM consortium, Edinburgh, UK.
Shaun McGillHealthcare Public Health, NHS England Midlands, Nottingham, UK.
Rachael L MurrayNottingham Centre for Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK and SPECTRUM consortium, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research 302872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is considerable interest in raising the age of sale of tobacco above the conventional age of 18 years. We systematically reviewed whether raising the minimum legal sales age of tobacco (MLSA) to 20 or above is associated with a reduced prevalence of smoking compared to an MLSA set at 18 or below. AIMS AND

methodsFollowing a preregistered protocol on PROSPERO (ref: CRD42022347604), six databases of peer-reviewed journals were searched from January 2015 to April 2024. Backward and forward reference searching was conducted. Included studies assessed the association between MLSAs ≥20 with cigarette smoking or cigarette sales for those aged 11-20 years. Assessments on e-cigarettes were excluded. Pairs of reviewers independently extracted study data. We used ROBINS-I to assess the risk of bias and GRADE to assess the quality of evidence. Findings were also synthesized narratively.

resultsTwenty-three studies were reviewed and 34 estimates of association were extracted. All extracted studies related to Tobacco 21 laws in the United States. Moderate quality evidence was found for reduced cigarette sales, moderate quality evidence was found for reduced current smoking for 18-20-year-olds, and low-quality evidence was found for reduced current smoking for 11-17-year-olds. The positive association was stronger for those with lower education. Study bias was variable.

conclusionsThere is moderate quality evidence that Tobacco 21 can reduce overall cigarette sales and current cigarette smoking amongst those aged 18-20 years. It has the potential to reduce health inequalities. Research in settings other than the United States is required. IMPLICATIONS: This systematic review on raising the minimum legal sale age of tobacco to 20 or above demonstrates there is moderate quality evidence that such laws reduce cigarette sales and moderate quality evidence they reduce smoking prevalence amongst those aged 18-20 years compared to a minimum legal sale age of 18 years or below. The research highlights potential benefits in reducing health inequalities, especially for individuals from lower educational backgrounds. Studies are limited to the United States, highlighting a need for more global research to assess the impact of these policies in other settings.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingCommerceTobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsHumansUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39234626
PMCPMC11847775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.