ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2024
Chinese expert consensus on standard technical specifications for a gut microecomics laboratory (Review).
Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Formation of gut microbiota and application of microecological regulators in children.Translational pediatrics · 2025Review
- Microbiota modulation for infectious complications following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric hematological malignancies.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Gut microbiota characteristics and therapeutic effects of fecal microbiota transplantation in children with autism spectrum disorder in central China: a combined cross-sectional and prospective study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- The bidirectional regulatory mechanism of gut microbiota metabolites on myocardial injury in heart failure from the perspective of the gut-heart axis: a review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intestinal microbiota is a complex ecosystem that not only affects various physiological functions, such as metabolism, inflammation and the immune response, but also has an important effect on the development of tumors and response to treatment. The detection of intestinal flora enables the timely identification of disease-related flora abnormalities, which has significant implications for both disease prevention and treatment. In the field of basic and clinical research targeting gut microbiome, there is a need to recognize and understand the laboratory assays for gut microbiomics. Currently, there is no unified standard for the experimental procedure, quality management and report interpretation of intestinal microbiome assay technology. In order to clarify the process, the Tumor and Microecology Committee of China Anti-Cancer Association and the Tumor and Microecology Committee of Hubei Provincial Immunology Society organized relevant experts to discuss and put forward the standard technical specifications for gut microecomics laboratories, which provides a basis for further in-depth research in the field of intestinal microecomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.