Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39234533›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2024

Use of artificial intelligence to support prehospital traumatic injury care: A scoping review.

Jake Toy, Jonathan Warren, Kelsey Wilhelm, Brant Putnam, Denise Whitfield, Marianne Gausche-Hill, Nichole Bosson, Ross Donaldson, Shira Schlesinger, Tabitha Cheng and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. TC3-VLM: A Vision-Language Model for Tactical Combat Casualty Care.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Use of artificial intelligence to support prehospital traumatic injury care: A scoping review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jake ToyThe Lundquist Institute, Department of Emergency Medicine Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0089-5495
Jonathan WarrenThe Lundquist Institute, Department of Emergency Medicine Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance California USA.
Kelsey WilhelmThe Lundquist Institute, Department of Emergency Medicine Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance California USA.
Brant PutnamDepartment of Surgery Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance California USA.
Denise WhitfieldThe Lundquist Institute, Department of Emergency Medicine Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance California USA.
Marianne Gausche-HillThe Lundquist Institute, Department of Emergency Medicine Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance California USA.
Nichole BossonThe Lundquist Institute, Department of Emergency Medicine Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance California USA.
Ross DonaldsonThe Lundquist Institute, Department of Emergency Medicine Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance California USA.
Shira SchlesingerThe Lundquist Institute, Department of Emergency Medicine Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance California USA.
Tabitha ChengThe Lundquist Institute, Department of Emergency Medicine Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance California USA.
Craig GoolsbyThe Lundquist Institute, Department of Emergency Medicine Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance California USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformative potential to support prehospital clinicians, emergency physicians, and trauma surgeons in acute traumatic injury care. This scoping review examines the literature evaluating AI models using prehospital features to support early traumatic injury care. Methods: We conducted a systematic search in August 2023 of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Two independent reviewers screened titles/abstracts, with a third reviewer for adjudication, followed by a full-text analysis. We included original research and conference presentations evaluating AI models-machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and natural language processing (NLP)-that used prehospital features or features available immediately upon emergency department arrival. Review articles were excluded. The same investigators extracted data and systematically categorized outcomes to ensure consistency and transparency. We calculated kappa for interrater reliability and descriptive statistics. Results: We identified 1050 unique publications, with 49 meeting inclusion criteria after title and abstract review (kappa 0.58) and full-text review. Publications increased annually from 2 in 2007 to 10 in 2022. Geographic analysis revealed a 61% focus on data from the United States. Studies were predominantly retrospective (88%), used local (45%) or national level (41%) data, focused on adults only (59%) or did not specify adults or pediatrics (27%), and 57% encompassed both blunt and penetrating injury mechanisms. The majority used machine learning (88%) alone or in conjunction with DL or NLP, and the top three algorithms used were support vector machine, logistic regression, and random forest. The most common study objectives were to predict the need for critical care and life-saving interventions (29%), assist in triage (22%), and predict survival (20%). Conclusions: A small but growing body of literature described AI models based on prehospital features that may support decisions made by dispatchers, Emergency Medical Services clinicians, and trauma teams in early traumatic injury care.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningemergency medical servicesmachine learningnatural language processingprehospital caretraumatic injury

Identifiers

PMID39234533
PMCPMC11372236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.