ArticleJOR spine2024
Neural network segmentation of disc volume from magnetic resonance images and the effect of degeneration and spinal level.
Article in JOR spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicenter evaluation of four large language models for automated spine imaging diagnosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in mechanical assessments of in vivo human lumbar spine tissues with noninvasive imaging techniques.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Text-guided multimodal deep learning in magnetic resonance imaging for spinal structures segmentation and lumbar abnormalities identification.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Neural network segmentation of disc volume from magnetic resonance images and the effect of degeneration and spinal level.JOR spine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) noninvasively quantifies disc structure but requires segmentation that is both time intensive and susceptible to human error. Recent advances in neural networks can improve on manual segmentation. The aim of this study was to establish a method for automatic slice-wise segmentation of 3D disc volumes from subjects with a wide range of age and degrees of disc degeneration. A U-Net convolutional neural network was trained to segment 3D T1-weighted spine MRI. Methods: Lumbar spine MRIs were acquired from 43 subjects (23-83 years old) and manually segmented. A U-Net architecture was trained using the TensorFlow framework. Two rounds of model tuning were performed. The performance of the model was measured using a validation set that did not cross over from the training set. The model version with the best Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was selected in each tuning round. After model development was complete and a final U-Net model was selected, performance of this model was compared between disc levels and degeneration grades. Results: Performance of the final model was equivalent to manual segmentation, with a mean DSC = 0.935 ± 0.014 for degeneration grades I-IV. Neither the manual segmentation nor the U-Net model performed as well for grade V disc segmentation. Compared with the baseline model at the beginning of round 1, the best model had fewer filters/parameters (75%), was trained using only slices with at least one disc-labeled pixel, applied contrast stretching to its input images, and used a greater dropout rate. Conclusion: This study successfully trained a U-Net model for automatic slice-wise segmentation of 3D disc volumes from populations with a wide range of ages and disc degeneration. The final trained model is available to support scientific use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.