SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Effectiveness of various interventions for non-traumatic osteonecrosis: a pairwise and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacotherapy of Kienböck Disease and the Carpal Avascular Necrosis Family: A Narrative Review with a Four-Axis Translation Framework.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Immunomodulation in the repair of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: reprogramming strategies for macrophages and immune cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Fibroblast IRF7-mediated chondrocyte apoptosis affects the progression of collapse in steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Immunomodulatory Mechanisms of Rehmanniae Radix Praeparata-Achyranthes Root-Chinese Angelica Root Combination in Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Comprehensive Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking Study Focusing on Immunological Pathways.Mediators of inflammation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is acknowledged as a prevalent, challenging orthopedic condition for patients. Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of various interventions for non-traumatic ONFH and provide guidance for clinical decision-makers. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to February 2023 for relevant randomized controlled trials evaluating treatments for femoral head necrosis, without language restrictions. Quality evaluation was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool, and analysis was performed using Stata 15.1. Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials were included in this study. The meta-analysis results revealed that CellTherapy [MD= -3.46, 95%CI= (-5.06, -1.85)], InjectableMed [MD= -3.68, 95%CI= (-6.11, -1.21)], ESWT [MD= -2.84, 95%CI= (-4.23, -1.45)], ESWT+InjectableMed [MD= -3.86, 95%CI= (-6.22, -1.53)] were significantly more effective in improving VAS pain score than CD+PTRI, as well as CD+BG+CellTherapy, and CD+BG. Furthermore, CD+BG+CellTherapy was better than CD+BG [MD= -0.97, 95%CI= (-1.71, -0.19)]. The SUCRA ranking for HHS score indicated that CellTherapy (77%) has the best effectiveness rate, followed by ESWT+InjectableMed (72.2%), ESWT (58.3%), InjectableMed (50%), CD+PTRI (31.4%), and CD+BG (11%). In terms of WOMAC and Lequesne scores, the meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences between the experimental group CD+BG+CellTherapy and the control group CD+BG. Conclusion: CellTherapy and non-surgical ESWT combined with medication or CellTherapy have the best effect on ONFH. Surgical CD+BG combined with CellTherapy is more effective than CD+BG alone. ESWT+InjectableMed is recommended for short-term or acute onset patients, while ESWT is recommended for long-term patients. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42024540122.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.