ArticleBiology methods & protocols2024
Methods in cancer research: Assessing therapy response of spheroid cultures by life cell imaging using a cost-effective live-dead staining protocol.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting the miR-19b/PPP2R5E axis enhances temozolomide response in glioblastoma via ROS-induced DNA damage.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Thymoquinone and pentoxifylline modulate 5-fluorouracil-induced senescence and apoptosis in colorectal cancer spheroids.Research in pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Article
- Protodioscin enhances Methotrexate-induced senescence and senolytic activity in HepG2 liver cancer spheroids by modulating cell cycle regulators and the TGF-β/p-Smad2-4 signaling pathway.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- pH-responsive release of small molecule pharmaceuticals from a reworked adsorbent hydrogel for environmental applications.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Rapid and reproducible generation of glioblastoma spheroids for high-throughput drug screening.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spheroid cultures of cancer cell lines or primary cells represent a more clinically relevant model for predicting therapy response compared to two-dimensional cell culture. However, current live-dead staining protocols used for treatment response in spheroid cultures are often expensive, toxic to the cells, or limited in their ability to monitor therapy response over an extended period due to reduced stability. In our study, we have developed a cost-effective method utilizing calcein-AM and Helix NP™ Blue for live-dead staining, enabling the monitoring of therapy response of spheroid cultures for up to 10 days. Additionally, we used ICY BioImage Analysis and Z-stacks projection to calculate viability, which is a more accurate method for assessing treatment response compared to traditional methods on spheroid size. Using the example of glioblastoma cell lines and primary glioblastoma cells, we show that spheroid cultures typically exhibit a green outer layer of viable cells, a turquoise mantle of hypoxic quiescent cells, and a blue core of necrotic cells when visualized using confocal microscopy. Upon treatment of spheroids with the alkylating agent temozolomide, we observed a reduction in the viability of glioblastoma cells after an incubation period of 7 days. This method can also be adapted for monitoring therapy response in different cancer systems, offering a versatile and cost-effective approach for assessing therapy efficacy in three-dimensional culture models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.