ReviewAdvanced biomedical research2024
The Relationship Between Iron and Zinc Deficiency and Aphthous Stomatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Advanced biomedical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is known as the most common ulcerative lesion in the oral mucosa. Aphthous has an unknown etiology and is considered a multifactorial disease. This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between iron and zinc deficiency and the occurrence of RAS. Materials and Methods: This systematic review and metaanalysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metaanalyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data were obtained through an electronic search in international databases, including PubMed, Medline, Embase, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, Springer, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Clinical Key, and Google Scholar, and domestic Persian databases, including SID, Magiran, and Iran Medex, until April 2021. New-castle Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to determine the eligibility of studies by evaluating the title and summary of the articles and a partial evaluation of the full text. Comprehensive Metaanalysis (CMA) software was used for data analysis. Results: Initially, a total of 1383 articles were retrieved, of which 941 were duplicate studies. Further, 384 studies were excluded after evaluation of the title and abstract, and 36 studies were excluded after considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, 22 articles were included in the metaanalysis. The standardized mean difference value was -0.421 (-0.623--0.20) for iron factor, -0.309 (-0.463--0.154) for iron factor in men, -0.483 (-0.375--0373) for iron factor in women, and -0.955 (-0.282--1.628) for the zinc factor. Conclusion: In general, the serum iron level (in general, in male and female patients separately) and the zinc serum level in patients with RAS were significantly lower than those of healthy people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.