Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39234367›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand and microsurgery2024

Phalangeal fractures: A retrospective comparison of open reduction and internal fixation vs. closed reduction and percutaneous pinning.

Anamika Veeramani, Mara Z Meulendijks, Hannah Szapary, Steven P Moura, Barbara Gomez-Eslava, Yannick A J Hoftiezer, Neal C Chen, Kyle R Eberlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anamika VeeramaniDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Mara Z MeulendijksDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Hannah SzaparyDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Steven P MouraDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Barbara Gomez-EslavaHarvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Yannick A J HoftiezerHand & Arm Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Neal C ChenHarvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Kyle R EberlinDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of phalangeal fractures is guided by fracture characteristics, patient factors and surgeon judgment. This study retrospectively compares characteristics of phalangeal fractures treated with closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) with those of fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) to identify risk factors associated with reoperation. A total of 901 phalangeal fractures were included and treated operatively by either CRPP (748 fractures, 83 ​%) or ORIF (153 fractures, 17 ​%). Demographics, surgical management, and complication data were collected. Statistical analyses were performed to stratify risk associations and identify potential predictors of reoperation. With multivariate analysis and bootstrapped LASSO regression, fractures addressed by means of ORIF (vs. CRPP), work-related fractures, and open fractures were found to be independently associated with reoperation. These findings can be used to guide patient selection, surgical planning and timing of fracture repair. Level of evidence: Level III, Therapeutic.

Indexed as

ComplicationCRPPFractureORIFPhalanxReoperation

Identifiers

PMID39234367
PMCPMC11369723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.