ArticleJournal of hand and microsurgery2024
Ulnar shaft diameter as it relates to plate osteosynthesis: A cadaveric study.
Article in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ulnar shaft fractures are common and the standard of care treatment is with 3.5 mm plating. The purpose of this study was to measure diameters along the length of the ulna to provide information on screw length and appropriateness of 3.5 mm screws and plate location. Methods: Ten embalmed cadaveric ulnas were dissected free of all soft tissues. The length of the ulna was measured and then divided by four. Transverse osteotomies were performed along the length of the ulna at ¼, ½ and ¾ its full length. The diameter of the ulna at these locations was then measured in a radio-ulnar direction as well as a volar-dorsal direction. Results: There were five female and five male specimens with an average age of 83.6 and 78.8 respectively. The smallest diameter in both the female and male specimens was in the distal ¾ shaft measured in a volar-dorsal direction with an average of 9.1 mm and 12 mm. The average volar-dorsal measurement was less than radio-ulnar measurement at all locations. The diameters increased along the ulna heading proximally. Conclusion: This study provides information pertinent to screw width and length with respect to the ulnar shaft and calls in to question the use of 3.5 mm screws in the distal and midshaft ulnar diaphysis in females. Removal of 3.5 mm screws in the mid and distal ulnar shaft in females can leave a hole corresponding to 23% and 27% of the bone which can be concerning for a stress riser.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.