ArticleThe East African health research journal2024
Knowledge and Attitude Towards Cervical Cancer Screening Among Female Students in Allied Health Colleges in Shinyanga Region.
Article in The East African health research journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting knowledge of cervical cancer screening among reproductive-age women in sub-saharan africa using machine learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and associated factors of cervical cancer screening among women in Debre Markos town, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Knowledge, attitude, practices, and associated factors toward cervical cancer among female health sciences students of Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cause of death among women of reproductive age (15-49 years). In Tanzania, cervical cancer is the first cause of mortality and morbidity among females with cancers. The disease impact is highly associated with a lack of adequate knowledge and a negative attitude toward cervical cancer screening among healthcare workers (HCWs).This study aimed to assess knowledge and attitude toward cervical cancer screening among female students as future HCWs from allied health colleges in the Shinyanga region. Method: Descriptive cross-sectional study data was collected from 420 students in allied health colleges using a self-administered questionnaire. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22, Likert, and brooms cut-off points. The association between cervical cancer screening and the independent variables on knowledge, attitude, and other related factors was established by using logistic regression, and the Odds Ratio (OR) of greater than one, 95% confidence interval, and a Results: Two-thirds of the respondents 276 (65.7%) had low knowledge, while only 34 (8.1%) had very good knowledge of cervical cancer and screening. Most of the respondents 298 (70.1%) had a favorable attitude toward cervical cancer screening. Only 52 (12.1%) had ever screened for cervical cancer. Logistic regression showed odds at 2.37 (95% CI, 1.30-4.31, Conclusion: The study showed there is low knowledge of cervical cancer screening among female students in health and allied colleges, despite a favorable attitude toward the practice of screening. A well-integrated approach to providing comprehensive and practical aspects of cervical cancer screening during formal training in the curriculum for female students should be adopted to increase their knowledge and positive attitude toward screening.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.