Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39234311›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2024

The impact of sucralose and neotame on the safety of metal precipitation in electronic cigarettes.

Xinyang Yan, Zheng Chen, Xianfang Rong, Zhichao Chen, Guanlin Wu, Zeyi Dong, Yao Fu, Tao Hai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Biological and Behavioral Responses ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xinyang YanResearch and Development Center, IMiracle (Shenzhen) Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Zheng ChenResearch and Development Center, IMiracle (Shenzhen) Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Xianfang RongResearch and Development Center, IMiracle (Shenzhen) Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Zhichao ChenResearch and Development Center, IMiracle (Shenzhen) Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Guanlin WuResearch and Development Center, IMiracle (Shenzhen) Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Zeyi DongResearch and Development Center, IMiracle (Shenzhen) Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Yao FuResearch and Development Center, IMiracle (Shenzhen) Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Tao HaiResearch and Development Center, IMiracle (Shenzhen) Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of sweeteners on the release of heavy metals during the heating and atomization processes in electronic cigarettes. Based on a PG/VG base e-liquid with the addition of 2% and 5% neotame or sucralose, we quantitatively analyzed the impact of sweetener content on the levels of heavy metals such as Ni, Cr, and Fe in the e-liquid and aerosol after heating and atomization. Additionally, the heated e-liquid samples were used to culture SH-SY-5Y and Beas-2B cells, and their cytotoxic effects were assessed using the CCK-8 assay. The results indicated that the e-liquid with 5% sucralose had the highest average levels of heavy metals after heating and atomization, particularly nickel (13.36 ± 2.50 mg/kg in the e-liquid and 12,109 ± 3,229 ng/200 puffs in the aerosol), whereas the e-liquid with neotame had significantly lower average heavy metal content in comparison. Additionally, it was measured that the chloride ion concentration in the e-liquid with 5% sucralose reached 191 mg/kg after heating at 200°C for 1 h, indicating that heating sucralose generated chloride ions, Which might corrode metal parts components leading to heavy metal release. Cytotoxicity tests revealed that the base e-liquid without sweeteners exhibited the highest average cell viability after heating, at 64.80% ± 2.84% in SH-SY-5Y cells and 63.24% ± 0.86% in Beas-2B cells. Conversely, the e-liquid variant with 5% sucralose showed a significant reduction in average cell viability, reducing it to 50.74% ± 0.88% in SH-SY-5Y cells and 53.03% ± 0.76% in Beas-2B cells, highlighting its more pronounced cytotoxic effects compared to other tested e-liquids. In conclusion, sucralose in e-liquids should be limited preferably less than 2%, or replaced with neotame, a safer alternative, to minimize health risks.

Indexed as

aerosolcytotoxicityelectronic cigarettesheavy metalsneotamesucralose

Identifiers

PMID39234311
PMCPMC11371770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.