ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2024
The association of exhaled carbon monoxide with atrial fibrillation and left atrial size in the Framingham Heart Study.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) is associated with subclinical and overt cardiovascular disease and stroke. The association between eCO with left atrial size, prevalent, or incident atrial fibrillation (AF) are uncertain. Methods: eCO was measured using an Ecolyzer instrument among Framingham Heart Study Offspring and Omni participants who attended an examination from 1994 to 1998. We analyzed multivariable-adjusted (current smoking, and other covariates including age, race, sex, height, weight, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, diabetes, hypertension treatment, prevalent myocardial infarction [MI], and prevalent heart failure [HF]). Cox and logistic regression models assessed the relations between eCO and incident AF (primary model), and prevalent AF and left atrial (LA) size (pre-specified secondary analyses). We also conducted secondary analyses adjusting for biomarkers, and interim MI and interim HF. Results: Our study sample included 3814 participants (mean age 58 ± 10 years; 54.4 % women, 88.4 % White). During an average of 18.8 ± 6.5 years follow-up, 683 participants were diagnosed with AF. eCO was associated with incident AF after adjusting for established AF risk factors (HR, 1.31 [95 % CI, 1.09-1.58]). In secondary analyses the association remained significant after additionally adjusting for C-reactive protein and B-type natriuretic peptide, and interim MI and CHF, and in analyses excluding individuals who currently smoked. eCO was not significantly associated with LA size and prevalent AF. Conclusion: In our community-based sample of individuals without AF, higher mean eCO concentrations were associated with incident AF. Further investigation is needed to explore the biological mechanisms linking eCO with AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.