Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39234247›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2024

Autoantibodies in cancer: a systematic review of their clinical role in the most prevalent cancers.

Ana Montero-Calle, María Garranzo-Asensio, Maria Teresa Moreno-Casbas, Susana Campuzano, Rodrigo Barderas

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana Montero-Calle *Chronic Disease Programme (UFIEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
María Garranzo-Asensio *Chronic Disease Programme (UFIEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Maria Teresa Moreno-CasbasInvestén-isciii, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Susana CampuzanoDepartamento de Química Analítica, Facultad de CC. Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Rodrigo BarderasChronic Disease Programme (UFIEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although blood autoantibodies were initially associated with autoimmune diseases, multiple evidence have been accumulated showing their presence in many types of cancer. This has opened their use in clinics, since cancer autoantibodies might be useful for early detection, prognosis, and monitoring of cancer patients. In this review, we discuss the different techniques available for their discovery and validation. Additionally, we discuss here in detail those autoantibody panels verified in at least two different reports that should be more likely to be specific of each of the four most incident cancers. We also report the recent developed kits for breast and lung cancer detection mostly based on autoantibodies and the identification of novel therapeutic targets because of the screening of the cancer humoral immune response. Finally, we discuss unsolved issues that still need to be addressed for the implementation of cancer autoantibodies in clinical routine for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and/or monitoring.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesBiomarkers, TumorNeoplasmsAnimalsEarly Detection of CancerHumansPrognosisAutoantibodiesBiomarkers, Tumorautoantibodiesbreast cancercancer autoantibodiescolorectal cancerhumoral immune responselung cancerprostate cancerproteomics

Identifiers

PMID39234247
PMCPMC11371560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.