Observational studyFrontiers in immunology2024
Post-marketing drug safety surveillance of enfortumab vedotin: an observational pharmacovigilance study based on a real-world database.
Observational study in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eosinophil Proportion May Serve as a Candidate Biomarker for Adverse Events in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Enfortumab Vedotin.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Multi-target-directed drugs: new additions in 2025 and post-marketing safety surveillance of drugs marketed in 2022-2024.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Review
- Severe Diffuse Ulcerative Esophagitis Following Treatment with Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Adverse Events Associated with Clascoterone: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Identifying cardiac safety signals of disproportionate reporting for CGRP antagonists: evidence from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Oncology: Principles, Clinical Development, and Future Directions.MedComm · 2026Review
- Comparative safety analysis of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab: monotherapy vs. combination therapy insights from FDA adverse event reporting system data.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- The real-world safety profile of enfortumab vedotin with or without pembrolizumab: insights from a comparative analysis of FAERS.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Adverse Events Associated with Tirzepatide: Updated Pharmacovigilance Analysis Using FAERS (2022 Q1-2025 Q1) with an Adapted Time-to-Onset Method.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2026Article
- Article
- Diverse Roles of Antibodies in Antibody-Drug Conjugates.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Antibody-drug conjugate: a newly developed biological missile for tumor treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that has been approved by the FDA for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study presents a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis of the post-marketing safety profile of EV in the real-world based on the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: Adverse event (AE) reports regarding EV between January 2020 and December 2023 were obtained from the FAERS database. The standardized MedDRA query (SMQ) narrow search AEs on the preferred term (PT) level were used. Disproportionality analysis was performed to identify the AE signals for EV with the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN). Results: A total of 2,216 reports regarding EV were included in the present study. SMQ analysis results indicated that a stronger strength signal was found in severe cutaneous adverse reactions, retroperitoneal fibrosis, and peripheral neuropathy. A total of 116 significant disproportionality PTs referring to 14 system organ classes (SOCs) were retained by disproportionality analysis, with 49 PTs not listed on the EV drug label. Frequently reported EV-related AEs included rash, peripheral neuropathy, decreased appetite, alopecia, and pruritus. The time to onset of the majority of EV-related AEs was within 30 days (66.05%), with only 0.73% events occurring after 1 year. Conclusion: The disproportionality analysis highlights that dermatologic toxicity and peripheral neuropathy were the major AEs induced by EV. The potential AEs not listed on the drug label were mainly related to gastrointestinal, hepatic, and pulmonary events. Further research is needed to confirm and explore the EV-related AEs in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.