Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39234230›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2024

The Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine Position Statement on the Management of Sepsis in Resource-limited Settings.

Deven Juneja, Prashant Nasa, Gunjan Chanchalani, Anusha Cherian, Bharat G Jagiasi, Yash Javeri, Venkat R Kola, Amol T Kothekar, Prashant Kumar, Mohan Maharaj and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Retrospective evaluation of efficacy of CytoSorbWorld journal of critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Early Sepsis Prediction: A Scoping Review.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Serum Uric Acid in Sepsis: A Hidden Prognostic Clue or Just Another Red Herring?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Prokineticin-2 and Procalcitonin's Diagnostic Accuracy for Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. The Clinical Utility of Targeted Heart Rate Control in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Efficacy and Safety of Continuous vs Intermittent Linezolid Infusion in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Deven JunejaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8841-5678
Prashant NasaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, NMC Specialty Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1948-4060
Gunjan ChanchalaniDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, K.J. Somaiya Hospital & Research Center, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8429-8526
Anusha CherianDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9017-5311
Bharat G JagiasiDepartment of Critical Care, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3068-1201
Yash JaveriDepartment of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, Regency Super Speciality Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7384-3637
Venkat R KolaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Yashoda Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6971-1236
Amol T KothekarDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7751-1314
Prashant KumarDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Yatharth Hospital, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5046-7421
Mohan MaharajDepartment of Critical Care, Medicover Hospitals, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4971-4545
Manish MunjalDepartment of Critical Care, ManglamPlus Medicity Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1435-753X
Sivakumar M NandakumarDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Royal Care Super Speciality Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2036-7390
Anand NikaljeDepartment of Medicine, Medical Centre and Research Institute (MCRI) ICU, MGM Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1694-800X
Rakesh NongthombamDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, J.N. Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1376-7978
Sumit RayDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Holy Family Hospital, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5192-4711
Mahesh K SinhaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ramkrishna CARE Hospitals, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4623-6675
Kanwalpreet SodhiDepartment of Critical Care, Deep Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7377-9225
Sheila N MyatraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6761-163X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis poses a significant global health challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Several aspects of sepsis management recommended in international guidelines are often difficult or impossible to implement in resource-limited settings (RLS) due to issues related to cost, infrastructure, or lack of trained healthcare workers. The Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) drafted a position statement for the management of sepsis in RLS focusing on India, facilitated by a task force of 18 intensivists using a Delphi process, to achieve consensus on various aspects of sepsis management which are challenging to implement in RLS. The process involved a comprehensive literature review, controlled feedback, and four iterative surveys conducted between 21 August 2023 and 21 September 2023. The domains addressed in the Delphi process included the need for a position statement, challenges in sepsis management, considerations for diagnosis, patient management while awaiting an intensive care unit (ICU) bed, and treatment of sepsis and septic shock in RLS. Consensus was achieved when 70% or more of the task force members voted either for or against statements using a Likert scale or a multiple-choice question (MCQ). The Delphi process with 100% participation of Task Force members in all rounds, generated consensus in 32 statements (91%) from which 20 clinical practice statements were drafted for the management of sepsis in RLS. The clinical practice statements will complement the existing international guidelines for the management of sepsis and provide valuable insights into tailoring sepsis interventions in the context of RLS, contributing to the global discourse on sepsis management. Future international guidelines should address the management of sepsis in RLS. How to cite this article: Juneja D, Nasa P, Chanchalani G, Cherian A, Jagiasi BG, Javeri Y,

Indexed as

Developing countriesLow- and middle-income countriesLow resource settingsResource-limited settingsSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID39234230
PMCPMC11369916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.