ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2024
Safety and Efficacy of Gefitinib Administration After Osimertinib-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease: A Six-Case Series.
Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: A successful rechallenge with aumolertinib after osimertinib-induced severe interstitial lung disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Successful Switch to Afatinib and Osimertinib Rechallenge with Corticosteroids after Osimertinib-induced Interstitial Lung Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the standard treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations. Although the frequency of osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease (osi-ILD) is high, the optimal cancer treatment after osi-ILD has not been established. This time, we focused on the safety and efficacy of gefitinib following osi-ILD. Case Presentation: We experienced six cases (five women and one man; median age: 74 years) in which gefitinib was administered after osi-ILD. All six cases had grade 2 or higher osi-ILD and required steroid treatment. The computed tomography imaging pattern of osi-ILD revealed organizing pneumonia in three cases, diffuse alveolar damage in two cases, and hypersensitivity pneumonia in one case. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1 in four cases, 2 in one case, and 3 in one case. EGFR mutation status was exon 19 deletion in two cases and exon 21 L858R in four cases. Only one patient experienced recurrence of ILD after receiving gefitinib. The best response to gefitinib was partial response in two cases and stable disease in three cases; one case was not evaluable. The median progression-free survival after treatment with gefitinib was 190 days (95% confidence interval: 33-328). Conclusion: The treatment with gefitinib after the development of osi-ILD was safe and effective. Gefitinib may be a promising option for patients who recovered from severe osi-ILD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.