Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39233973›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Addressing Global Gaps in Mammography Screening for Improved Breast Cancer Detection: A Review of the Literature.

Shreya Naik, Albert P Varghese, Syed Asrar Ul Haq Andrabi, Suhas Tivaskar, Anurag Luharia, Gaurav V Mishra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shreya NaikRadiology, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Albert P VargheseRadiology, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Syed Asrar Ul Haq AndrabiRadiology, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Suhas TivaskarRadiology, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Anurag LuhariaRadiology, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Gaurav V MishraRadiology, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the second most common cancer globally, with 2.3 million new cases annually, constituting 11.6% of all cancer cases. It is also the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths, claiming 670,000 lives a year. This high incidence of breast cancer morbidity worldwide has increased the urgent need for standardized and adequate screening methods, including clinical breast examination, self-breast examination, and mammography screening tests for non-symptomatic individuals. Mammography is considered the gold standard for breast cancer screening, with early randomized control trials showing significant reductions in mortality rates in women aged 50 and over (International Agency for Research on Cancer and American College of Radiology). Despite this, discrepancies in mammography practices across different healthcare settings regarding adherence to international standards raise concerns. A comprehensive review of the vast literature looking at the practices and norms of mammography screening worldwide highlighted several domains that present limitations to screening. These include epidemiological data deficits, lack of educational training offered to radiographers and varied image quality indices, exposure technique, method of breast compression, dose calculation, reference levels, screening frequency intervals, and diverse distribution of resources, particularly in developing countries. These factors shed light on the substantial discrepancies in the implementation and efficacy of screening programs, underscoring the necessity for future research endeavors to collaborate in creating coherent, standardized, evidence-based guidelines. Addressing these issues can enhance the feasibility, sensitivity, and accessibility of screening programs, resulting in favorable impacts on the early diagnosis and survival of breast cancer on a global scale.

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast imaging guidelinesmammography screeningquality assurancequality control

Identifiers

PMID39233973
PMCPMC11373670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.