ArticleCureus2024
Comparative Invitro Testing of the Tensile Bond Strength Under Artificial Aging Between Different Lithium Disilicate Ceramics to Composite Substrate: A Novel Methodology.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of multiple firings on mechanical and optical properties of CAD/CAM lithium disilicate-based glass ceramics.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Influence of Surface Treatments and Thermocycling on Wettability, Roughness, and Bond Strength of Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Ceramics.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison of different silane primer systems on composite resin bond strength to lithium disilicate ceramics.The Saudi dental journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The purpose of this study is to compare the tensile bond strength values to composite substrate pre- and post-aging between IPS E.max CAD and Initial LiSi. Methods The study utilized four blocks of IPS E.max CAD LT/B1 C14 (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein, Germany) (referred to as E) and four blocks of Initial LiSi LT/B1 (GC, Tokyo, Japan) (referred to as L). These blocks were milled to produce 76 ceramic bars measuring 2 mm × 2 mm × 10 mm (E = 38, L = 38/n = 19). After acid etching with hydrofluoric acid (BISCO, Schaumburg, IL, USA) and silane application (BIS-SILANE, BISCO), the specimens were embedded in putty (Express STD, 3M, Decatur, AL, USA) to create a mold for the resin cement (RelyX U200, 3M). Subsequently, one group of each brand underwent mechanical tensile testing (E0 and L0), while the other groups were subject to tensile testing after artificial aging involving 500 thermal cycles between 5 and 55°C (E5 and L5). The mean tensile strength for each group (E0, E5, L0, and L5) was determined using the Brown-Forsythe one-way ANOVA and Tamhane's post hoc tests. Results Initial LiSi showed a superior pre-aging mean (11.7 MPa). However, both materials had identical post-aging means (7.6 MPa). There were no statistically significant differences, except between the dependent Initial LiSi groups (L0-L5). Most failure modes were mixed (cohesive cement and adhesive). There were no cohesive failures on the cement side except in three specimens of Initial LiSi post-aging. Conclusion The tested conditions have shown that Initial Lisi exhibited the highest pre-aging mean; however, it exhibited inferior bond stability under aging conditions compared to IPS E.max CAD. Analyzing the microstructure before and after aging may provide insights into the greater decrease in bond strength observed in the Initial LiSi specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.