Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39233892›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024

Analyzing classification and feature selection strategies for diabetes prediction across diverse diabetes datasets.

Jayakumar Kaliappan, I J Saravana Kumar, S Sundaravelan, T Anesh, R R Rithik, Yashbir Singh, Diana V Vera-Garcia, Yassine Himeur, Wathiq Mansoor, Shadi Atalla and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jayakumar KaliappanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
I J Saravana KumarSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
S SundaravelanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
T AneshSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
R R RithikSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Yashbir SinghRadiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Diana V Vera-GarciaRadiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Yassine HimeurCollege of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Wathiq MansoorCollege of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Shadi AtallaCollege of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Kathiravan SrinivasanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In the evolving landscape of healthcare and medicine, the merging of extensive medical datasets with the powerful capabilities of machine learning (ML) models presents a significant opportunity for transforming diagnostics, treatments, and patient care. Methods: This research paper delves into the realm of data-driven healthcare, placing a special focus on identifying the most effective ML models for diabetes prediction and uncovering the critical features that aid in this prediction. The prediction performance is analyzed using a variety of ML models, such as Random Forest (RF), XG Boost (XGB), Linear Regression (LR), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Support VectorMachine (SVM), across numerousmedical datasets. The study of feature importance is conducted using methods including Filter-based, Wrapper-based techniques, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (Explainable AI). By utilizing Explainable AI techniques, specifically Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), the decision-making process of the models is ensured to be transparent, thereby bolstering trust in AI-driven decisions. Results: Features identified by RF in Wrapper-based techniques and the Chi-square in Filter-based techniques have been shown to enhance prediction performance. A notable precision and recall values, reaching up to 0.9 is achieved in predicting diabetes. Discussion: Both approaches are found to assign considerable importance to features like age, family history of diabetes, polyuria, polydipsia, and high blood pressure, which are strongly associated with diabetes. In this age of data-driven healthcare, the research presented here aspires to substantially improve healthcare outcomes.

Indexed as

diabetes predictionexplainable AIfilter-based feature selectionmachine learningwrapper-based feature selection

Identifiers

PMID39233892
PMCPMC11371799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.