ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024
Analyzing classification and feature selection strategies for diabetes prediction across diverse diabetes datasets.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing healthcare explainability through multiobjective counterfactual explanations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A consensus-weighted multi-agent ensemble feature selection framework for antibiotic susceptibility prediction in pediatric respiratory diseases.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- SMENN-hybrid: an efficient technique combining the synthetic minority oversampling technique with ensemble learning for diabetes prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prognostic factors identification using machine learning in temporomandibular disorder treatment responders.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2025Article
- Hierarchical random forest model, inflammation and oxidative stress as predictors of the atherogenic index of plasma and diabetes progression.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Data-driven diabetes mellitus prediction and management: a comparative evaluation of decision tree classifier and artificial neural network models along with statistical analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced diabetes prediction using skip-gated recurrent unit with gradient clipping approach.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Energy landscape analysis of health checkup data clarified multiple pathways to diabetes development in obese and non-obese subjects.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Observational
- A hybrid ensemble approach for diabetes prediction using consensus-based feature selection.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the evolving landscape of healthcare and medicine, the merging of extensive medical datasets with the powerful capabilities of machine learning (ML) models presents a significant opportunity for transforming diagnostics, treatments, and patient care. Methods: This research paper delves into the realm of data-driven healthcare, placing a special focus on identifying the most effective ML models for diabetes prediction and uncovering the critical features that aid in this prediction. The prediction performance is analyzed using a variety of ML models, such as Random Forest (RF), XG Boost (XGB), Linear Regression (LR), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Support VectorMachine (SVM), across numerousmedical datasets. The study of feature importance is conducted using methods including Filter-based, Wrapper-based techniques, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (Explainable AI). By utilizing Explainable AI techniques, specifically Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), the decision-making process of the models is ensured to be transparent, thereby bolstering trust in AI-driven decisions. Results: Features identified by RF in Wrapper-based techniques and the Chi-square in Filter-based techniques have been shown to enhance prediction performance. A notable precision and recall values, reaching up to 0.9 is achieved in predicting diabetes. Discussion: Both approaches are found to assign considerable importance to features like age, family history of diabetes, polyuria, polydipsia, and high blood pressure, which are strongly associated with diabetes. In this age of data-driven healthcare, the research presented here aspires to substantially improve healthcare outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.