Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39233821›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2024

Diagnostic difficulties in the differentiation between an ovarian metastatic low‑grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm and primary ovarian mucinous cancer: A case report and literature review.

Weronika Kawecka, Aneta Adamiak-Godlewska, Dorota Lewkowicz, Karolina Urbańska, Andrzej Semczuk

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Weronika KaweckaThe Second Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital no. 4, Lublin Medical University, PL-20090 Lublin, Poland.
Aneta Adamiak-GodlewskaThe Second Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital no. 4, Lublin Medical University, PL-20090 Lublin, Poland.
Dorota LewkowiczDepartment of Clinical Pathomorphology, Lublin Medical University, PL-20090 Lublin, Poland.
Karolina UrbańskaStudents' Research Group at The Second Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, Lublin Medical University, PL-20090 Lublin, Poland.
Andrzej SemczukThe Second Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital no. 4, Lublin Medical University, PL-20090 Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) is a tumor that primarily originates from the appendix and belongs to the family of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs). In 50% of female patients, AMNs (particularly LAMNs) have a tendency to metastasize to organs in the genital tract, where the neoplasm can mimic the features of primary ovarian mucinous cancer (POMC). The present case report reviewed the difficulties in differentiating between these two types of tumors. In the present case report, a 61-year-old female patient was admitted to the Second Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Hospital no. 4 at Lublin Medical University (Lublin, Poland) with the diagnosis of a right ovarian mass. After performing ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) scans and laboratory analysis, the patient underwent total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, appendectomy and resection of the Douglas peritoneum. Notably, the postoperative pathological assessment revealed LAMN with metastases to the right ovary and omentum. Immunohistochemically, cytokeratin 20 and caudal type homeobox 2 both stained positively, whereas paired box gene 8 stained negatively. After surgery, the patient received the recommended hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at the Department of Surgical Oncology at Lublin Medical University. After 1 year, a CT scan was performed, which indicated no evidence of recurrent disease. In conclusion, observations from the present case report suggest that gynecologists should be conscious of the possibility of malignancies of gastrointestinal origin in cases of ovarian tumors instead of making direct assumptions of POMC. If the mucinous mass involves the base of the appendix or if there is a suspicion of positive margins, then cytoreductive surgery and right-sided hemicolectomy must be performed. In addition, identifying the origin of mucinous tumors in the right ovary and/or the appendix requires the histopathological examination of a panel of markers using immunohistochemistry.

Indexed as

appendiceal tumorimmunohistochemistryLAMNmetastasismucinous neoplasmPMP

Identifiers

PMID39233821
PMCPMC11369849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.