Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39233798›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy techniques2024

Navigation in Multiligament Knee Reconstruction: A Proof-of-Concept Study on a Femoral Sawbones Model.

William T Wilson, Julian A Feller, Lachlan M Batty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William T WilsonOrthoSport Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Julian A FellerOrthoSport Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lachlan M BattyOrthoSport Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiligament knee reconstruction surgery is technically challenging, requiring careful planning and execution. Accurate placement of bone tunnels is important for graft function and there is an inherent risk of tunnel collision, which can compromise graft integrity. In this proof-of-concept study, we present a technique using computer navigation to help optimize tunnel placement and to avoid collision during multiligament knee reconstruction. A computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system was used to plan and execute femoral tunnel placement on a Sawbones model, for a Schenck KD-IV multiligament knee reconstruction. After CT scanning of the Sawbones model, commercially available software was used to plan tunnel trajectories for reconstruction of the posterolateral corner, medial ligament complex, and both cruciate ligaments. Tunnel entry points and trajectories were based on bony landmarks as identified on CT. The model was successfully registered with an accuracy of <0.5 mm. Execution of tunnel drilling was carried out for 7 femoral tunnels, guided by computer navigation. A postprocedure CT scan was then performed and superimposed over the preoperative planning scan. This demonstrated excellent correlation between planned and executed tunnels with no evidence of tunnel collision. This study supports the idea of using computer navigation to plan and execute tunnels in multiligament knee reconstruction.

Identifiers

PMID39233798
PMCPMC11369949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.