Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39233753›Full record

ReviewMethodsX2024

Integrating musealized archaeological sediment collections into current geoarchaeological analytical frameworks for sustainable research practices.

Stefano Costanzo, Marta Pappalardo, Elisabetta Starnini, Elena Rossoni-Notter, Olivier Notter, Abdelkader Moussous, Miguel Soares-Remiseiro, Paola Fermo, Mauro Cremaschi, Andrea Zerboni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stefano CostanzoDipartimento di Scienze della Terra "Ardito Desio", Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Marta PappalardoDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Elisabetta StarniniDipartimento di Civiltà e Forme del Sapere, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Elena Rossoni-NotterMuseum of Prehistoric Anthropology of Monaco, Monaco.
Olivier NotterMuseum of Prehistoric Anthropology of Monaco, Monaco.
Abdelkader MoussousMuseum of Prehistoric Anthropology of Monaco, Monaco.
Miguel Soares-RemiseiroThe interdisciplinary Center for Archaeology and Evolution of Human Behaviour, Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
Paola FermoDipartimento di Chimica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Mauro CremaschiDipartimento di Scienze della Terra "Ardito Desio", Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Andrea ZerboniDipartimento di Scienze della Terra "Ardito Desio", Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a review of the latest framework achievements in geoarchaeological sciences applied to microstratigraphic and biomolecular studies of prehistoric archaeological contexts, highlighting the importance of musealized archaeological stratigraphies. We assess how today's scientific and technological accomplishments can be tailored for archaeological human ecology studies with analytical ensembles that provide unprecedented results. Sampling and processing workflows originating from resin consolidation and thin section micromorphology of undisturbed blocks of archaeological soils and sediments, guarantee subsampling accuracy at the micrometre scale granting access to individual components otherwise impossible to target: the achievable information yield makes even the smallest soil samples potential sources of pioneering discoveries. Yet, archaeological excavations are still the primary mode of retrieving new soil samples. We argue that, when dealing with archaeological sites that were excavated and partially musealised in the past, the exploration of related museum collections should be prioritized as perspective source of new study samples. Analysing old and potentially very informative samples, with an approach that we define as "Green Archaeology", may represent a source of well-structured primary data as well as a means for planning new excavations, delivering novel discoveries while safeguarding site integrity and promoting Third Mission valorisation of sites and heritage dormant collections.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyBiomarkersGeoarchaeological frameworks for Human Ecology studiesGeoarchaeologyHuman ecologyMuseum collectionsSedaDNAThin section micromorphology

Identifiers

PMID39233753
PMCPMC11372796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.