Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39233693›Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2024

A federated learning architecture for secure and private neuroimaging analysis.

Dimitris Stripelis, Umang Gupta, Hamza Saleem, Nikhil Dhinagar, Tanmay Ghai, Chrysovalantis Anastasiou, Rafael Sánchez, Greg Ver Steeg, Srivatsan Ravi, Muhammad Naveed and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Medical Imaging Applications of Federated Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dimitris StripelisUniversity of Southern California, Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA 90292, USA.
Umang GuptaUniversity of Southern California, Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA 90292, USA.
Hamza SaleemUniversity of Southern California, Computer Science Department, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Nikhil DhinagarUniversity of Southern California, Imaging Genetics Center, Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, Marina del Rey, CA 90292, USA.
Tanmay GhaiUniversity of Southern California, Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA 90292, USA.
Chrysovalantis AnastasiouUniversity of Southern California, Computer Science Department, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Rafael SánchezUniversity of Southern California, Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA 90292, USA.
Greg Ver SteegUniversity of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Srivatsan RaviUniversity of Southern California, Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA 90292, USA.
Muhammad NaveedUniversity of Southern California, Computer Science Department, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Paul M ThompsonUniversity of Southern California, Imaging Genetics Center, Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, Marina del Rey, CA 90292, USA.
José Luis AmbiteUniversity of Southern California, Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA 90292, USA.

Funding

Ultrascale Machine Learning to Empower Discovery in Alzheimers Disease BiobanksU01AG068057 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Christos Davatzikos, Heng Huang · 2020 to 2026
$20.7M
Multi-Source Sparse Learning to Identify MCI and Predict DeclineRF1AG051710 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THOMPSON, PAUL M, WANG, YALIN · 2016 to 2016
$2.8M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG051710NIA NIH HHS U01 AG068057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The amount of biomedical data continues to grow rapidly. However, collecting data from multiple sites for joint analysis remains challenging due to security, privacy, and regulatory concerns. To overcome this challenge, we use federated learning, which enables distributed training of neural network models over multiple data sources without sharing data. Each site trains the neural network over its private data for some time and then shares the neural network parameters (i.e., weights and/or gradients) with a federation controller, which in turn aggregates the local models and sends the resulting community model back to each site, and the process repeats. Our federated learning architecture, MetisFL, provides strong security and privacy. First, sample data never leave a site. Second, neural network parameters are encrypted before transmission and the global neural model is computed under fully homomorphic encryption. Finally, we use information-theoretic methods to limit information leakage from the neural model to prevent a "curious" site from performing model inversion or membership attacks. We present a thorough evaluation of the performance of secure, private federated learning in neuroimaging tasks, including for predicting Alzheimer's disease and for brain age gap estimation (BrainAGE) from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies in challenging, heterogeneous federated environments where sites have different amounts of data and statistical distributions.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseBrainAGEdeep learningfederated learninghomomorphic encryptionMRIneuroimagingprivacysecurity

Identifiers

PMID39233693
PMCPMC11368680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.