Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39233622›Full record

SynthesisThe Gerontologist2024

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Physical Capability, Social Support, Loneliness, Depression, Anxiety, and Life Satisfaction in Older Adults.

Santi Sulandari, Rachel O Coats, Amy Miller, Alexander Hodkinson, Judith Johnson

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Gerontologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Quality of Life and Loneliness Among Older Adults in Primorsko-Goranska County.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Santi SulandariSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0091-3382
Rachel O CoatsSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4415-408X
Amy MillerSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8549-5158
Alexander HodkinsonDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2063-0977
Judith JohnsonSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0431-013X

Funding

BPPTCentre for Higher Education FundingIndonesia Endowment Fund for EducationLPDP 1152/PLPP.1/BPI.LG/III/2023Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and TechnologyMinistry of FinanceRepublic of Indonesia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPhysical capability, social support, loneliness, depression, and anxiety predict life satisfaction in older adults. Currently, no systematic review and meta-analysis have been conducted to investigate the strength of these associations globally. Therefore, this study quantified the strength of these associations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus. We included observational studies assessing the association between physical capability, social support, loneliness, depression, and anxiety with life satisfaction in adults aged 65+.

resultsIn total, 10,552 articles were identified, of which 78 studies in 164,478 participants were included in the systematic review and 57 were included in the meta-analysis. Greater life satisfaction was significantly associated with greater physical capabilities (odds ratio [OR] = 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.01-3.45; p < .001, k = 35, n = 33,732), higher social support (OR = 3.27; 95% CI: 2.59-4.13, k = 20 studies, n = 13,228), reduced loneliness (OR = 3.30; 95% CI: 2.53-4.30, k = 11, n = 33,638), depression (OR = 4.76; 95% CI: 3.10-7.32, k = 24, n = 64,097), and anxiety (OR = 5.10; 95% CI: 2.21-11.78, k = 5, n = 43,368). The strength of associations did not vary between Western and Eastern countries, year of publication, or quality. Gender was a moderator: Loneliness was more strongly associated with life satisfaction in females. Age was also a moderator; the association between social support and life satisfaction weakened with increasing age. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Improving the physical capabilities of older individuals, fostering social support, and alleviating feelings of loneliness, depression, and anxiety may help build life satisfaction in older individuals, which policy-makers and healthcare professionals should prioritize when implementing strategies.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionLonelinessPersonal SatisfactionSocial SupportAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleCross-cultural studiesFunction/mobilitySuccessful agingWell-being

Identifiers

PMID39233622
PMCPMC11512076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.