Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39233319›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025

Innovating a community-driven enumeration and needs assessment of people experiencing homelessness: a network sampling approach for the HUD-mandated point-in-time count.

Zack W Almquist, Ihsan Kahveci, Mary Ashley Hazel, Owen Kajfasz, Janelle Rothfolk, Claire Guilmette, M C Anderson, Larisa Ozeryansky, Amy Hagopian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zack W AlmquistDepartments of Sociology and Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1967-123X
Ihsan KahveciDepartment of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0184-9498
Mary Ashley HazelFrancis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7680-5460
Owen KajfaszKing County Regional Homelessness Authority, Seattle, WA 98104, United States.
Janelle RothfolkKing County Regional Homelessness Authority, Seattle, WA 98104, United States.
Claire GuilmetteKing County Regional Homelessness Authority, Seattle, WA 98104, United States.
M C AndersonEarth System Science, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, United States.
Larisa OzeryanskyInterdisciplinary Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.
Amy HagopianDepartments of Health Systems and Population Health and Global Health University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2120-8295

Funding

Methods and Data CoreR24HD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAR, CORINNE M · 2002 to 2016
$9.3M
Center for Studies in Demography & Ecology at the University of Washington; NSF CAREEREunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development HD042828Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development SES-2142964NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To enumerate people experiencing homelessness in the United States, the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) mandates its designated local jurisdictions regularly conduct a crude census of this population. This Point-in-Time (PIT) body count, typically conducted on a January night by volunteers with flashlights and clipboards, is often followed by interviews with a separate convenience sample. Here, we propose employing a network-based (peer-referral) respondent-driven sampling (RDS) method to generate a representative sample of unsheltered people, accompanied by a novel method to generate a statistical estimate of the number of unsheltered people in the jurisdiction. First, we develop a power analysis for the sample size of our RDS survey to count unsheltered people experiencing homelessness. Then, we conducted 3 large-scale population-representative samples in King County, WA (Seattle metro) in 2022, 2023, and 2024. We describe the data collection and the application of our new method, comparing the 2020 PIT count (the last visual PIT count performed in King County) to the new method of 2022 and 2024 PIT counts. We conclude with a discussion and future directions. This article is part of a Special Collection on Methods in Social Epidemiology.

Indexed as

Ill-Housed PersonsNeeds AssessmentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited Stateshard-to-reach populationshomelessnessnetworkspeople experiencing homelessnessrespondent-driven samplingsample datasocial networks

Identifiers

PMID39233319
PMCPMC12133266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.