ArticleJournal of virological methods2024
A multiplexed real-time PCR assay for simultaneous quantification of human immunodeficiency virus and Hepatitis B virus for low-and-middle- income countries.
Article in Journal of virological methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Residual transfusion risk of occult hepatitis B transmission associated to genotypes A and E among blood donors in Yaoundé, Cameroon.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Human metapneumovirus (hMPV) in 2025: emerging trends and insights from community and hospital-based respiratory panel analyses-a comprehensive review.Virology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to shared routes of transmission, including sexual contact and vertical transmission, HIV-HBV co-infection is common, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Measurement of viral load (VL), for both HIV and HBV, plays a critical role for determining their infectious phase and monitoring response to antiviral therapy. Implementation of viral load testing in clinical settings is a significant challenge in resource-limited countries, notably because of cost and availability issues. We designed HIV and HBV primers for conserved regions of the HIV and HBV genomes that were specifically adapted to viral strains circulating in West Africa that are HIV-1 subtype CRF02AG and HBV genotype E. We first validated two monoplex qPCR assays for individual quantification and, then developed a multiplex qPCR for simultaneous quantification of both viruses. HIV RNA and HBV DNA amplification was performed in a single tube using a one-step reverse transcription-PCR reaction with primers and probes targeting both viruses. Performance characteristics such as the quantification range, sensitivity, and specificity of this multiplex qPCR assay were compared to reference qPCR tests for both HIV and HBV viral load quantification. The multiplex assay was validated using clinical samples from co- or mono-infected patients and gave comparable viral load quantification to the HIV and HBV reference test respectively. The multiplex qPCR demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 71.25 % [68.16-74.3] for HBV and 82 % [78.09-85.90] for HIV and an overall specificity of 100 % [94.95-100] for both viruses. Although the overall sensitivities of the HIV and HBV assays were lower than the commercial comparator assays, the sensitivity in the clinical decision range of >1000 copies/mL for HIV was 80 % [71.26-88.73] and >1000 IU/mL for HBV was 100 % [95.51-100] which indicates the test results can be used to guide treatment decisions. This in-house developed multiplex qPCR assay represents a useful diagnostic tool as it can be performed on affordable "open" real-time PCR platforms currently used for HIV or SARS-Cov-2 infection surveillance in Mali.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.