Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39232839›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2024

Global distribution, diversity, and ecological niche of Picozoa, a widespread and enigmatic marine protist lineage.

Paula Huber, Daniele De Angelis, Hugo Sarmento, Sebastian Metz, Caterina R Giner, Colomban De Vargas, Luigi Maiorano, Ramon Massana, Ramiro Logares

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Open biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paula HuberDepartamento de Hidrobiología, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil. mariapaulahuber@gmail.com.
Daniele De AngelisDipartimento Di Biologia E Biotecnologie "Charles Darwin", Università Di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Hugo SarmentoDepartamento de Hidrobiología, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil. hugo.sarmento@gmail.com.
Sebastian MetzDepartment of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK.
Caterina R GinerInstitut de Ciències del Mar (ICM), CSIC, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Colomban De VargasSorbonne Universités, CNRS, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Roscoff, France.
Luigi MaioranoDipartimento Di Biologia E Biotecnologie "Charles Darwin", Università Di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Ramon MassanaInstitut de Ciències del Mar (ICM), CSIC, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Ramiro LogaresInstitut de Ciències del Mar (ICM), CSIC, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. ramiro.logares@icm.csic.es.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 303906/2021-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/15842-6H2020 Excellent Science 862923Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence CEX2019-000928-S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe backbone of the eukaryotic tree of life contains taxa only found in molecular surveys, of which we still have a limited understanding. Such is the case of Picozoa, an enigmatic lineage of heterotrophic picoeukaryotes within the supergroup Archaeplastida, which has emerged as a significant component of marine microbial planktonic communities. To enhance our understanding of the diversity, distribution, and ecology of Picozoa, we conduct a comprehensive assessment at different levels, from assemblages to taxa, employing phylogenetic analysis, species distribution modeling, and ecological niche characterization.

resultsPicozoa was among the ten most abundant eukaryotic groups, found almost exclusively in marine environments. The phylum was represented by 179 Picozoa's OTU (pOTUs) placed in five phylogenetic clades. Picozoa community structure had a clear latitudinal pattern, with polar assemblages tending to cluster separately from non-polar ones. Based on the abundance and occupancy pattern, the pOTUs were classified into four categories: Low-abundant, Widespread, Polar, and Non-polar. We calculated the ecological niche of each of these categories. Notably, pOTUs sharing similar ecological niches were not closely related species, indicating a phylogenetic overdispersion in Picozoa communities. This could be attributed to competitive exclusion and the strong influence of the seasonal amplitude of variations in environmental factors, such as temperature, shaping physiological and ecological traits.

conclusionsOverall, this work advances our understanding of uncharted protists' evolutionary dynamics and ecological strategies. Our results highlight the importance of understanding the species-level ecology of marine heteroflagellates like Picozoa. The observed phylogenetic overdispersion challenges the concept of phylogenetic niche conservatism in protist communities, suggesting that closely related species do not necessarily share similar ecological niches. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

EukaryotaPhylogenyAquatic OrganismsBiodiversityEcosystemSeawaterEcological nicheHeterotrophic flagellatesMarine picoeukaryoticMolecular diversityPhylogenetic overdispersionPicozoaProtistSpecies distribution modeling

Identifiers

PMID39232839
PMCPMC11373171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.