Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39232736›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2024

Uncovering the key working mechanisms of a complex community-based obesity prevention programme in the Netherlands using ripple effects mapping.

Irma Huiberts, Dorine Collard, Amika Singh, Mara Hendriks, Mai J M Chinapaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Irma HuibertsAmsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. i.huiberts@amsterdamumc.nl.
Dorine CollardMulier Instituut, Herculesplein 269, 3584AA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Amika SinghMulier Instituut, Herculesplein 269, 3584AA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mara HendriksMulier Instituut, Herculesplein 269, 3584AA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mai J M ChinapawAmsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMuch remains unknown about how complex community-based programmes can successfully achieve long-term impact. More insight is needed to understand the key mechanisms through which these programmes work. Therefore, we conducted an in-depth study in five communities that implemented the Healthy Youth, Healthy Future (JOGG) approach, a Dutch community-based obesity prevention programme. We aimed to identify perceived outcomes and long-term impacts among local stakeholders and explore potential causal pathways and working mechanisms.

methodsWe used ripple effects mapping (REM), a qualitative participatory method to map outcomes and identify causal pathways, in five communities. We involved 26 stakeholders, professionals and policy-makers affiliated with the local JOGG approach, spread over eight REM sessions and conducted individual interviews with 24 additional stakeholders. To uncover working mechanisms, we compared outcomes and causal pathways across communities.

resultsOver 5-9 years of implementation, participants perceived that JOGG had improved ownership of local stakeholders, health policies, intersectoral collaboration and social norms towards promoting healthy lifestyles. Causal pathways comprised small initial outcomes that created the preconditions to enable the achievement of long-term impact. Although exact JOGG actions varied widely between communities, we identified five common working mechanisms through which the JOGG approach contributed to causal pathways: (1) creating a positive connotation with JOGG, (2) mobilizing stakeholders to participate in the JOGG approach, (3) facilitating projects to promote knowledge and awareness among stakeholders while creating successful experiences with promoting healthy lifestyles, (4) connecting stakeholders, thereby stimulating intersectoral collaboration and (5) sharing stakeholder successes that promote healthy lifestyles, which gradually created a social norm of participation.

conclusionsThe JOGG approach seems to work through activating initial stakeholder participation and bolstering the process towards ownership, policy change, and intersectoral collaboration to promote healthy lifestyles. Key working mechanisms can inform further development of JOGG as well as other complex community-based prevention programmes.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHealth PromotionProgram EvaluationStakeholder ParticipationAdministrative PersonnelCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHealthy LifestyleHumansIntersectoral CollaborationMaleNetherlandsObesityQualitative ResearchResidence CharacteristicsSocial NormsChildCommunity basedComplexityHealth promotionHealthy lifestyleImplementationIntersectoralMechanismsObesityPreventionStakeholders

Identifiers

PMID39232736
PMCPMC11373344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.