Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39232732›Full record

Observational studyBMC public health2024

Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in professional settings, shops, shared transport, and leisure activities in France, 2020-2022.

Simon Galmiche, Tiffany Charmet, Arthur Rakover, Olivia Chény, Faïza Omar, Christophe David, Alexandra Mailles, Fabrice Carrat, Arnaud Fontanet

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04607941 (Study of Socio-demographic Factors, Behaviors and Practices Associated With Infection With SARS-CoV-2), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04607941 completednot on this map

Study of Socio-demographic Factors, Behaviors and Practices Associated With Infection With SARS-CoV-2

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitut PasteurRan2020 to 2022Enrolled766,818ConditionsCovid19ArmsQuestionnaires, Phone interviews
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Simon GalmicheEmerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, 25 rue du Docteur Roux, Paris, 75015, France. simon.galmiche@pasteur.fr.
Tiffany CharmetEmerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, 25 rue du Docteur Roux, Paris, 75015, France.
Arthur RakoverEmerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, 25 rue du Docteur Roux, Paris, 75015, France.
Olivia ChényClinical Research Coordination Office, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, 75015, France.
Faïza OmarDepartment of Public Affairs - Public Statistics, Institut Ipsos, Paris, 75013, France.
Christophe DavidDepartment of Public Affairs - Public Statistics, Institut Ipsos, Paris, 75013, France.
Alexandra MaillesSanté Publique France, Saint-Maurice, 94410, France.
Fabrice CarratSorbonne Université, Inserm, IPLESP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, 75012, France.
Arnaud FontanetEmerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, 25 rue du Docteur Roux, Paris, 75015, France.

Funding

ANRS-MIE ComCor projectINCEPTION project PIA/ANR-16-CONV-0005LabEx IBEID ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the study was to identify settings associated with SARS-CoV-2 transmission throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in France.

methodsCases with recent SARS-CoV-2 infection were matched with controls (4:1 ratio) on age, sex, region, population size, and calendar week. Odds ratios for SARS-CoV-2 infection were estimated for nine periods in models adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics, health status, COVID-19 vaccine, and past infection.

resultsBetween October 27, 2020 and October 2, 2022, 175,688 cases were matched with 43,922 controls. An increased risk of infection was documented throughout the study for open-space offices compared to offices without open space (OR range across the nine periods: 1.12 to 1.57) and long-distance trains (1.25 to 1.88), and during most of the study for convenience stores (OR range in the periods with increased risk: 1.15 to 1.44), take-away delivery (1.07 to 1.28), car-pooling with relatives (1.09 to 1.68), taxis (1.08 to 1.89), airplanes (1.20 to 1.78), concerts (1.31 to 2.09) and night-clubs (1.45 to 2.95). No increase in transmission was associated with short-distance shared transport, car-pooling booked over platforms, markets, supermarkets and malls, hairdressers, museums, movie theatres, outdoor sports, and swimming pools. The increased risk of infection in bars and restaurants was no longer present in restaurants after reopening in June 2021. It persisted in bars only among those aged under 40 years.

conclusionClosed settings in which people are less likely to wear masks were most affected by SARS-CoV-2 transmission and should be the focus of air quality improvement. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV (03/09/2022): NCT04607941.

Indexed as

COVID-19Leisure ActivitiesTransportationWorkplaceAdolescentAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesCommerceFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsYoung AdultCase-control studiesInfectious disease transmissionLeisure activitiesOccupational exposureSARS-CoV-2TravelWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID39232732
PMCPMC11376041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.