Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39232686›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research associated with church enrollment and intervention adoption in a national implementation study of a faith-based organizational change intervention.

Sara Wilcox, Ruth P Saunders, Andrew T Kaczynski, A Caroline Rudisill, Jessica Stucker, Deborah Kinnard, Brooke W McKeever, Kelsey R Day, Jasmin Parker-Brown, Ye Sil Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sara WilcoxPrevention Research Center and Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. wilcoxs@mailbox.sc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4992-4610
Ruth P SaundersPrevention Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Andrew T KaczynskiDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
A Caroline RudisillDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Jessica StuckerPrevention Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Deborah KinnardPrevention Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Brooke W McKeeverDepartment of Advertising and Public Relations, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA.
Kelsey R DayUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Jasmin Parker-BrownPrevention Research Center and Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Ye Sil KimPrevention Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.

Funding

USC PRC Center and Core Research Project: National Implementation Study of the Faith, Activity, and Nutrition (FAN) ProgramU48DP006401 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI WILCOX, SARA · 2018 to 2023
$8.0M
CDC HHS U48DP006401NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrganizational adoption is a key but understudied step in translating evidence-based interventions into practice. The purpose of this study was to report recruitment strategies and factors associated with church enrollment and intervention adoption in a national implementation study of the Faith, Activity, and Nutrition (FAN) program.

methodsWe worked with partners using multiple strategies to disseminate intervention availability. Interested churches completed an online form. To enroll, the church coordinator (FAN coordinator) and pastor completed baseline surveys and then received intervention online training access. We compared enrolled vs. non-enrolled churches on how they heard about the study and church characteristics. We compared intervention-adopting vs. non-adopting churches on Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs using Fisher's exact tests, χ

resultsWe received 226 interest forms; 107 churches enrolled, and 85 churches adopted the intervention. Faith-based sources were the most, and paid media the least, effective in reaching churches, which were largely from the southeast with a Methodist or Baptist tradition (no differences by enrollment status). Enrolled churches were less likely to have 500 + worshipers and more likely to have attended a study information session than non-enrolled churches. Church (CFIR inner setting) and FAN coordinator characteristics, but not intervention characteristics, were related to intervention adoption.

conclusionPartnerships, relationships, and "face time" are important for enrolling churches in evidence-based interventions. Church and church coordinator characteristics are related to intervention adoption. Further work on adoption conceptualization and operationalization is needed.

Indexed as

Faith-Based OrganizationsOrganizational InnovationAdultFemaleHealth PromotionHumansImplementation ScienceMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesAdoptionChurchesEvidence-based interventionsFaith-basedImplementation scienceNutritionOrganizational changePhysical activityPublic healthResearch translation

Identifiers

PMID39232686
PMCPMC11373172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.