ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2024
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension in Asians: a retrospective dual-center study.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of clinical profiles of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in patients with and without anemia.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- A Prospective Multicenter Study on the Evaluation of Frequency of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Observational
- Epidemiological Patterns, Treatment Response, and Metabolic Correlations of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A United States-Based Study From 1990 to 2024.ASIDE internal medicine · 2025Article
- IIH, SIH and headache: Diagnosis and treatment update.eNeurologicalSci · 2024Article
- Creating a Foundation for the Visualization of Intracranial Cerebrospinal Fluid Using Photon-Counting Technology in Spectral Imaging for Cranial CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere have been limited data on idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in Asians and there remain uncertainties whether a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure of 250 mm CSF is an optimum diagnostic cutoff. The aims of the present study included (1) characterization of IIH patients in Taiwan, (2) comparisons among different diagnostic criteria for IIH, and (3) comparisons between patients with CSF pressures of > 250 and 200-250 mm CSF.
methodsThis retrospective study involved IIH patients based on the modified Dandy criteria from two tertiary medical centers in Taiwan. Clinical manifestations were retrieved from electronic medical records, and findings on ophthalmologic examination and magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were reviewed.
resultsA total of 102 patients (71 F/31 M, mean age 33.4 ± 12.2 years, mean CSF pressure 282.5 ± 74.5 mm CSF) were identified, including 46 (45.1%) with obesity (body-mass index ≥ 27.5), and 57 (62.6%) with papilledema. Overall, 80 (78.4%), 55 (53.9%), 51 (50.0%), and 58 (56.9%) patients met the Second and Third Edition of International Classification of Headache Disorders, Friedman, and Korsbæk criteria, respectively. Patients in the 200-250 mm CSF group (n = 40) were less likely to have papilledema (48.5% vs. 70.7%, p = 0.035), transient visual obscuration (12.5% vs. 33.9%, p = 0.005), and horizontal diplopia (10.0% vs. 30.6%, p = 0.006), and had fewer signs on MRIs (2.2 ± 1.3 vs. 2.8 ± 1.0, p = 0.021) when compared with those with CSF pressures > 250 mm CSF (n = 62). However, the percentages of patients with headache (95.0% vs. 87.1%, p = 0.109) at baseline, chronic migraine at six months (31.6% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.578), and visual field defect (86.7% vs. 90.3%, p = 0.709) were similar.
conclusionsIt was found that obesity and papilledema were less common in Asian IIH patients when compared with Caucasian patients. Although patients with CSF pressures of 200-250 mm CSF had a less severe phenotype, the risks of having headache or visual loss were comparable to those in the > 250 mm CSF group. It is possible that a diagnostic cutoff of > 200 mm CSF could be more suitable for Asians, although further studies are still needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.