Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39232665›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2024

Clinical and genetic evaluation of hereditary myopathies in an adult Saudi cohort.

Reem M Alhammad, Marwa L Alrehaili, Hana M Albulaihe, Sultan S Aljereish, Mohammed H Alanazy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reem M AlhammadDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO Box 7805, Riyadh, 11472, Saudi Arabia. Ralhamad@ksu.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7931-6830
Marwa L AlrehailiDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO Box 7805, Riyadh, 11472, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2600-0009
Hana M AlbulaiheDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO Box 7805, Riyadh, 11472, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5177-8283
Sultan S AljereishDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO Box 7805, Riyadh, 11472, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0609-1510
Mohammed H AlanazyDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO Box 7805, Riyadh, 11472, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosis of hereditary myopathy is often challenging owing to overlapping clinical phenotypes and muscle histopathological findings. This retrospective study aimed to identify the phenotypic and genotypic spectra of hereditary myopathies at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

methodsWe reviewed the medical records of patients with hereditary myopathy who were evaluated between January 2018 and December 2022.

resultsEighty-seven patients (78 families) were included, two-thirds were men with a mean age of 35 (SD 14.2) years. Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) was the most prevalent clinical diagnosis (25 cases; 29%), of whom, a genetic diagnosis was achieved in 15 of 22 patients tested (68%). In genetically confirmed LGMD, the most prevalent disorders were dysferlinopathy (27%) followed by fukutin-related protein (FKRP) - related limb girdle muscular dystrophy (20%), sarcoglycanopathy (20%), lamin A/C related myopathy (13%), and calpain-3 myopathy (13%). In 26 patients with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, the genetic testing method was whole exome sequencing (WES) (42%), Next generation sequencing (NGS) (31%), and targeted single gene analysis (27%). The sensitivity of each genetic testing method was as follows: 100% for targeted single-gene analysis, 100% for targeted analysis of D4Z4 repeat array units, 88% for myotonic dystrophy protein kinase (DMPK) repeat expansion analysis, 42% for NGS-neuromuscular panel, and 46% for WES.

conclusionThe prevalent types of hereditary myopathies were consistent with those reported locally and internationally. This study highlights the diagnostic yield of various molecular genetic tests for the diagnosis of hereditary myopathy in an adult cohort and the need for improved access to advanced molecular testing in cases suspected to have facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) or mitochondrial myopathies.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingMuscular Dystrophies, Limb-GirdleAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesExome SequencingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscular DiseasesRetrospective StudiesSaudi ArabiaYoung AdultClinical phenotypes in inherited myopathiesGenetic myopathiesInherited myopathiesMolecular testing in inherited myopathies

Identifiers

PMID39232665
PMCPMC11373090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.