SynthesisLancet (London, England)2024
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure: an individual patient level meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Lancet (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04435626 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone on Morbidity and Mortality in Participants With Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 87 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone on Morbidity and Mortality in Participants With Heart Failure (NYHA II-IV) and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ≥ 40% (LVEF ≥ 40%)
Who cites it
87 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and mortality in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of hypertension · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effect of Finerenone in Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- A Bayesian analysis of finerenone in heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction: a pre-specified analysis of FINEARTS-HF.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2026Trial
- Eplerenone, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: findings from the EARLIER trial.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Trial
- Update on clinical heart failure trials.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Review
- Breakthrough drugs in the treatment of hypertension-related disease.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- The 'Chloride Theory' for Heart Failure Pathophysiology: An Updated Narrative Review 2025.Cardiology and therapy · 2026Review
- Trials and tribulations of spironolactone in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the SPIRIT-HF trial.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- The Heart-Kidney Axis in Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease: Mechanisms, Mediators, and Therapeutic Implications.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Contemporary medical therapy for heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Heart Failure with Reduced and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Network Interpretive Framework of Mechanisms, Phenotypes, and Therapeutic Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF): where are we now?Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Landmark clinical trials shaping contemporary guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Initiation of Neurohormonal Blockade and Clinical Outcomes in HeartMate 3 LVAD Recipients During Index Implantation.Artificial organs · 2026Article
- Heart failure in the elderly: epidemiology, mechanisms, and management.European heart journal · 2026Review
- Finerenone attenuates myocardial injury and enhances vascular repair via regulation of autophagy, apoptosis, and angiogenesis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Podcast Episode 2: Heart Failure Management in Patients with Diabetes for Endocrinologists, Primary Care Physicians, and Noncardiologist Clinicians: Focus on SGLT2 Inhibitors.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Article
- Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction as a Multisystem Syndrome: A Mechanistically Anchored Endotype Framework for Precision Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduce hospitalisations and death in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but the benefit in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unclear. We evaluated the effect of MRAs in four trials that enrolled patients with heart failure across the range of ejection fraction.
methodsThis is a prespecified, individual patient level meta-analysis of the RALES (spironolactone) and EMPHASIS-HF (eplerenone) trials, which enrolled patients with HFrEF, and of the TOPCAT (spironolactone) and FINEARTS-HF (finerenone) trials, which enrolled patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was a composite of time to first hospitalisation for heart failure or cardiovascular death. We also estimated the effect of MRAs on components of this composite, total (first or repeat) heart failure hospitalisations (with and without cardiovascular deaths), and all-cause death. Safety outcomes were also assessed, including serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum potassium, and systolic blood pressure. An interaction between trials and treatment was tested to examine the heterogeneity of effect in these populations. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024541487.
findings13 846 patients were included in the four trials. MRAs reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalisation (hazard ratio 0·77 [95% CI 0·72-0·83]). There was a statistically significant interaction by trials and treatment (p for interaction=0·0012) due to the greater efficacy in HFrEF (0·66 [0·59-0·73]) compared with HFmrEF or HFpEF (0·87 [0·79-0·95]). We observed significant reductions in heart failure hospitalisation in the HFrEF trials (0·63 [0·55-0·72]) and the HFmrEF or HFpEF trials (0·82 [0·74-0·91]). The same pattern was observed for total heart failure hospitalisations with or without cardiovascular death. Cardiovascular death was reduced in the HFrEF trials (0·72 [0·63-0·82]) but not in the HFmrEF or HFpEF trials (0·92 [0·80-1·05]). All-cause death was also reduced in the HFrEF trials (0·73 [0·65-0·83]) but not in the HFmrEF or HFpEF trials (0·94 [0·85-1·03]). With an MRA, the risk of hyperkalaemia was doubled compared with placebo (odds ratio 2·27 [95% CI 2·02-2·56]), but the incidence of serious hyperkalaemia (serum potassium >6·0 mmol/L) was low (2·9% vs 1·4%); the risk of hypokalaemia (potassium <3·5 mmol/L) was halved (0·51 [0·45-0·57]; 7% vs 14%).
interpretationSteroidal MRAs reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalisation in patients with HFrEF and non-steroidal MRAs reduce this risk in patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF.
fundingNone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39232490What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.