Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39232107›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Corneal biomechanical properties and potential influencing factors in varying degrees of myopia.

Yunxiao Sun, Yiqin Guo, Ruiqi Pang, Jieting Peng, Kai Cao, Ningli Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Short-term digital ocular massage may weaken corneal biomechanics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yunxiao SunBeijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yiqin GuoBeijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Ruiqi PangBeijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Jieting PengEye College of Chengdu University of TCM, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Kai CaoBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ningli WangBeijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. wningli@vip.163.com.

Funding

Beijing Hospitals Youth Talent Program 2021-YJJ-ZZL-036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the corneal biomechanical parameters measured by Corvis ST in subjects with varying degrees of myopia. And the factors that may affect corneal biomechanical properties were also investigated. Participants in this prospective cross-sectional study were classified into three groups according to spherical equivalent (SE) and axial length (AL): Non-myopia (NM, SE > - 0.50 D and AL < 26 mm), Mild-to-moderate myopia (MM, - 6.00 D < SE ≤ - 0.50 D and AL < 26 mm), high myopia (HM, SE ≤ - 6.00 D or AL ≥ 26 mm). Ten corneal biomechanical parameters were finally included. Linear mixed-effects model accounting for using both eyes in the same participant was carried out to evaluate how the corneal biomechanical parameter was influenced by varying degrees of myopia after adjusting for biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT). Further, multiple linear regression was performed to explore the correlation between corneal biomechanical parameter and SE, AL, bIOP or CCT. A total of 304 eyes from 224 healthy myopic subjects were recorded. There were 95 eyes with NM, 122 eyes with MM, and 87 eyes with HM. After adjusting for bIOP and CCT, eyes with high myopia showed shorter highest concavity time (HC-time, p = 0.025), greater peak distance (PD, p = 0.001), greater deflection amplitude (DA-Max, p = 0.002), smaller whole eye movement (WEM-Max, p < 0.001) and reduced stiffness parameter (SP-A1, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed that five parameters (HC-time, p < 0.001; PD, p < 0.001; DA-Max, p = 0.001; WEM-Max, p < 0.001; and SP-A1, p < 0.001) of Corvis ST were significantly correlated with AL, and one parameter (Corvis biomechanical index, p = 0.016) has significant relationship with SE. With the increase of myopia, significant changes in several corneal biomechanical parameters indicated a progressive decrease in corneal stiffness, independent of bIOP and CCT. Corneal biomechanical parameters may be predictors of scleral mechanical strength in high myopia, which has certain application value in clinical management of myopia.

Indexed as

CorneaMyopiaAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleProspective StudiesYoung AdultAxial lengthCorneal biomechanical propertiesCorvis STSpherical equivalentVarying degrees of myopia

Identifiers

PMID39232107
PMCPMC11374800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.