Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39232065›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Deep learning approach for detecting tomato flowers and buds in greenhouses on 3P2R gantry robot.

Rajmeet Singh, Asim Khan, Lakmal Seneviratne, Irfan Hussain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rajmeet Singh *Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Asim Khan *Khalifa University Center for Robotics and Autonomous Systems (KUCARS), Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Lakmal SeneviratneDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Irfan HussainDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. irfan.hussain@ku.ac.ae.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, significant advancements have been made in the field of smart greenhouses, particularly in the application of computer vision and robotics for pollinating flowers. Robotic pollination offers several benefits, including reduced labor requirements and preservation of costly pollen through artificial tomato pollination. However, previous studies have primarily focused on the labeling and detection of tomato flowers alone. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop a comprehensive methodology for simultaneously labeling, training, and detecting tomato flowers specifically tailored for robotic pollination. To achieve this, transfer learning techniques were employed using well-known models, namely YOLOv5 and the recently introduced YOLOv8, for tomato flower detection. The performance of both models was evaluated using the same image dataset, and a comparison was made based on their Average Precision (AP) scores to determine the superior model. The results indicated that YOLOv8 achieved a higher mean AP (mAP) of 92.6% in tomato flower and bud detection, outperforming YOLOv5 with 91.2%. Notably, YOLOv8 also demonstrated an inference speed of 0.7 ms when considering an image size of

Indexed as

Deep LearningFlowersPollinationRoboticsSolanum lycopersicumImage Processing, Computer-AssistedBudDeep learningPollination robotTomato flowerTransfer learningYOLO

Identifiers

PMID39232065
PMCPMC11374987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.