ArticleScientific reports2024
Functional outcomes and quality of life after AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens implantation in a real-world study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the effects of trifocals and extended depth of focus intraocular lens implantation on stereopsis and contrast sensitivity in cataract patients.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Trial
- Extended Depth of Field Intraocular Lens for Cataract After Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment: A Prospective Trial.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Patient-reported outcome measures after non-diffractive extended range of field IOL implantation: PureSee versus Vivity.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Article
- Visual Outcomes Three and Six Months After Bilateral Implantation of Extended Monofocal Isopure 1.2.3 Lenses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- An Update on Intraocular Lens Technology for Presbyopia Correction and Visual Outcomes.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Simulated vs. real visual performance of an EDOF intraocular lens using adaptive optics technology.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Observational
- Reasons for dissatisfaction after implantation of extended depth-of-focus and trifocal intraocular lenses: a retrospective case series.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Early Visual Performance and Subjective Experience After Bilateral Implantation of a Novel Fully Refractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Refractive Outcomes of a Low-Addition Refractive, Rotationally Asymmetric Bifocal IOL and Its Toric Version: A Comparative Cohort Study of 316 Eyes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of color perception in cataract patients bilateral implanted with presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The extended depth-of-focus AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens technology offers promising features for presbyopia management, evaluated in this research in a 6 months real-world setting. Prospective interventional mono-centric study including 40 patients who underwent elective bilateral phacoemulsification. We performed one pre-operative visit (V0) and one evaluation six months post-operatively (V1), evaluating uncorrected and corrected visual acuity for near (UNVA/CNVA), intermediate (UIVA/CIVA) and far (UDVA/UCVA), slit-lamp evaluation, tomography with static pupillometry, endothelial cell count and contrast sensitivity chart. In order to assess post-operative Quality of Life, we administered the patients McAlinden's Quality of Vision test and Morlock's Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire. We divided eyes in with Toric-IOL and with non-Toric IOL. A total of 36 eyes received non-tonic IOL implantation, whereas 44 eyes received toric IOL implantation. There were no statistically significant disparities observed in visual outcome measures and contrast sensitivity between the toric group and the non-toric group. Furthermore, we assessed the predictive preoperative refractive astigmatism (PPRA) and residual refractive astigmatism (RRA) in both cohorts, and no statistical significance was found between the two cohorts (p = 0.08). Twenty-one (53%) patients reported total independence from their glasses at all distances. The mean difference between the predicted and measured refractive error, as calculated by spherical equivalent, was 0.09 D. AcrySof IQ Vivity is a well-tolerated and effective IOL with optimal refractive target for both distant and intermediate vision, needing slight spherical addition for the best near vision. Great questionnaire-based satisfaction was reported by the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.