ArticleMusculoskeletal surgery2025
No difference in clinical outcomes when retaining or sacrificing the posterior cruciate ligament in medial congruent total knee replacement. A retrospective study.
Article in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of preservation versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament on clinical outcomes after medial congruent total knee arthroplasty using mechanical alignment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Comparable outcomes with a potential functional advantage of PCL preservation in medial-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the FP-UCBM Knee Study Group.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of retaining or sacrificing the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in patients who undergo primary total knee replacement (TKR) with the medial congruent (MC) implant.
methodsThis retrospective study looks at patients who underwent TKR with the MC implant. Comparison was made between the group with the PCL sacrificed (MC-PCLS) and the group with the PCL retained (MC-PCLR). Range of motion (ROM), Oxford knee score (OKS), Knee society knee score (KS-KS) and Knee society function score (KS-FS) were recorded.
resultsThe study identified 76 patients. 50 in the MC-PCLS group and 26 in the MC-PCLR group. Both groups had similar patient demographics. Three months postoperatively, OKS and KS-KS had significant improvement. However, there was significant improvement in KS-FS score in the MC-PCLS group but not the MC-PCLR group (MC-PCLR: 33 ± 17, p = 0.07; MC-PCLS: 19 ± 24, p = 0.01). Twelve months postoperatively, the OKS continued to improve significantly for both groups, while the KS-FS and KS-KS scores appeared to stagnate. The ROM continued to improve significantly for the MC-PCLR group but not the MC-PCLS group (MC-PCLR: 7 ± 9, p = 0.03; MC-PCLS: 4 ± 9, p = 0.30). Both groups were similar in ROM, OKS and KSS scores at both the 3 and 12 month post-operative period.
conclusionThere is no difference in post-operative outcomes with the PCL retained or sacrificed. As such, surgeons can consider routinely sacrificing the PCL for easier balancing of the knee and shorter surgical time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39231900What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.