Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39231886›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Unsupervised and Self-supervised Learning in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Denoising: Insights from Training Strategies.

Feixiang Zhao, Mingzhe Liu, Mingrong Xiang, Dongfen Li, Xin Jiang, Xiance Jin, Cai Lin, Ruili Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Feixiang ZhaoSchool of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University of Technology, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China.
Mingzhe LiuSchool of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University of Technology, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China.
Mingrong XiangSchool of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University of Technology, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China. mingrong.xiang@hotmail.com.
Dongfen LiCollege of Computer Science and Cyber Security, Chengdu University of Technology, 1 East Third Road, Chengdu, 610059, Sichuan, China.
Xin JiangSchool of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University of Technology, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China.
Xiance JinDepartment of Radiotherapy Center, The first Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China.
Cai LinDepartment of Burn, Wound Repair and Regenerative Medicine Center, The first Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China.
Ruili WangSchool of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University of Technology, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

Key Project of Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation Z24A050009Key Project of Zhejiang Provincial Health Science and Technology Program WKJ-ZJ-2437Key Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province 2023C03170Major Project of Wenzhou Science and Technology Bureau ZY2022016Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province 2022PY069National Natural Science Foundation of China U19A2086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, X-ray low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has garnered widespread attention due to its significant reduction in the risk of patient radiation exposure. However, LDCT images often contain a substantial amount of noises, adversely affecting diagnostic quality. To mitigate this, a plethora of LDCT denoising methods have been proposed. Among them, deep learning (DL) approaches have emerged as the most effective, due to their robust feature extraction capabilities. Yet, the prevalent use of supervised training paradigms is often impractical due to the challenges in acquiring low-dose and normal-dose CT pairs in clinical settings. Consequently, unsupervised and self-supervised deep learning methods have been introduced for LDCT denoising, showing considerable potential for clinical applications. These methods' efficacy hinges on training strategies. Notably, there appears to be no comprehensive reviews of these strategies. Our review aims to address this gap, offering insights and guidance for researchers and practitioners. Based on training strategies, we categorize the LDCT methods into six groups: (i) cycle consistency-based, (ii) score matching-based, (iii) statistical characteristics of noise-based, (iv) similarity-based, (v) LDCT synthesis model-based, and (vi) hybrid methods. For each category, we delve into the theoretical underpinnings, training strategies, strengths, and limitations. In addition, we also summarize the open source codes of the reviewed methods. Finally, the review concludes with a discussion on open issues and future research directions.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSupervised Machine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedUnsupervised Machine LearningHumansRadiation DosageSignal-To-Noise RatioDeep learningDenoisingLow-dose CTSelf-supervised learningUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID39231886
PMCPMC11950483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.