ReviewJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Unsupervised and Self-supervised Learning in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Denoising: Insights from Training Strategies.
Review in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, X-ray low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has garnered widespread attention due to its significant reduction in the risk of patient radiation exposure. However, LDCT images often contain a substantial amount of noises, adversely affecting diagnostic quality. To mitigate this, a plethora of LDCT denoising methods have been proposed. Among them, deep learning (DL) approaches have emerged as the most effective, due to their robust feature extraction capabilities. Yet, the prevalent use of supervised training paradigms is often impractical due to the challenges in acquiring low-dose and normal-dose CT pairs in clinical settings. Consequently, unsupervised and self-supervised deep learning methods have been introduced for LDCT denoising, showing considerable potential for clinical applications. These methods' efficacy hinges on training strategies. Notably, there appears to be no comprehensive reviews of these strategies. Our review aims to address this gap, offering insights and guidance for researchers and practitioners. Based on training strategies, we categorize the LDCT methods into six groups: (i) cycle consistency-based, (ii) score matching-based, (iii) statistical characteristics of noise-based, (iv) similarity-based, (v) LDCT synthesis model-based, and (vi) hybrid methods. For each category, we delve into the theoretical underpinnings, training strategies, strengths, and limitations. In addition, we also summarize the open source codes of the reviewed methods. Finally, the review concludes with a discussion on open issues and future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.