ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2025
Brain tumor detection and segmentation using deep learning.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid deep learning framework based on VGG19 and U-Net for accurate brain tumor segmentation in MRI images.Magnetic resonance letters · 2026Article
- High-precision brain tumor segmentation with switchable normalization in faster R-CNN architecture.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advancing Brain Tumor Diagnosis Using Deep Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review on Methodological Approaches to Glioma Segmentation and Classification Through Multiparametric MRI.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Hybrid 2D/3D CNN and radiomics model for brain tumor classification using EfficientNetb0 and ResNet-18.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- An Efficient Neuro-framework for Brain Tumor Classification Using a CNN-based Self-supervised Learning Approach with Genetic Optimizations.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Article
- Automated segmentation of lymph node metastases in colorectal cancer based on convolutional KAN.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- A single MRI scan contains sufficient imaging information for accurate prediction of meningioma growth risk.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Efficient attention-based Ghost-ResNet for brain tumor classification in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Intelligent brain tumor detection using hybrid finetuned deep transfer features and ensemble machine learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Efficient Brain Tumor Segmentation for MRI Images Using YOLO-BT.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multiple deep learning models based on MRI images in discriminating glioblastoma from solitary brain metastases: a multicentre study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Application research on YOLOv5 model based on Lightweight Atrous Attention Module in brain tumor MRI image segmentation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBrain tumor detection, classification and segmentation are challenging due to the heterogeneous nature of brain tumors. Different deep learning-based algorithms are available for object detection; however, the performance of detection algorithms on brain tumor data has not been widely explored. Therefore, we aim to compare different object detection algorithms (Faster R-CNN, YOLO & SSD) for brain tumor detection on MRI data. Furthermore, the best-performing detection network is paired with a 2D U-Net for pixel-wise segmentation of abnormal tumor cells. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe proposed model was evaluated on the Brain Tumor Figshare (BTF) dataset, and the best-performing detection network cascaded with 2D U-Net for pixel-wise segmentation of tumors. The best-performing detection network was also fine-tuned on BRATS 2018 data to detect and classify the glioma tumor.
resultsFor the detection of three tumor types, YOLOv5 achieved the highest mAP of 89.5% on test data compared to other networks. For segmentation, YOLOv5 combined with 2D U-Net achieved a higher DSC compared to the 2D U-Net alone (DSC: YOLOv5 + 2D U-Net = 88.1%; 2D U-Net = 80.5%). The proposed method was compared with the existing detection and segmentation network i.e. Mask R-CNN and achieved a higher mAP (YOLOv5 + 2D U-Net = 89.5%; Mask R-CNN = 67%) and DSC (YOLOv5 + 2D U-Net = 88.1%; Mask R-CNN = 44.2%).
conclusionIn this work, we propose a deep-learning-based method for multi-class tumor detection, classification and segmentation that combines YOLOv5 with 2D U-Net. The results show that the proposed method not only detects different types of brain tumors accurately but also delineates the tumor region precisely within the detected bounding box.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39231857What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.