Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39231857›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2025

Brain tumor detection and segmentation using deep learning.

Rafia Ahsan, Iram Shahzadi, Faisal Najeeb, Hammad Omer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rafia AhsanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Medical Image Processing Research Group (MIPRG), COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Iram ShahzadiOncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
Faisal NajeebDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Medical Image Processing Research Group (MIPRG), COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan. faisal.najeeb@comsats.edu.pk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7709-6915
Hammad OmerDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Medical Image Processing Research Group (MIPRG), COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBrain tumor detection, classification and segmentation are challenging due to the heterogeneous nature of brain tumors. Different deep learning-based algorithms are available for object detection; however, the performance of detection algorithms on brain tumor data has not been widely explored. Therefore, we aim to compare different object detection algorithms (Faster R-CNN, YOLO & SSD) for brain tumor detection on MRI data. Furthermore, the best-performing detection network is paired with a 2D U-Net for pixel-wise segmentation of abnormal tumor cells. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe proposed model was evaluated on the Brain Tumor Figshare (BTF) dataset, and the best-performing detection network cascaded with 2D U-Net for pixel-wise segmentation of tumors. The best-performing detection network was also fine-tuned on BRATS 2018 data to detect and classify the glioma tumor.

resultsFor the detection of three tumor types, YOLOv5 achieved the highest mAP of 89.5% on test data compared to other networks. For segmentation, YOLOv5 combined with 2D U-Net achieved a higher DSC compared to the 2D U-Net alone (DSC: YOLOv5 + 2D U-Net = 88.1%; 2D U-Net = 80.5%). The proposed method was compared with the existing detection and segmentation network i.e. Mask R-CNN and achieved a higher mAP (YOLOv5 + 2D U-Net = 89.5%; Mask R-CNN = 67%) and DSC (YOLOv5 + 2D U-Net = 88.1%; Mask R-CNN = 44.2%).

conclusionIn this work, we propose a deep-learning-based method for multi-class tumor detection, classification and segmentation that combines YOLOv5 with 2D U-Net. The results show that the proposed method not only detects different types of brain tumors accurately but also delineates the tumor region precisely within the detected bounding box.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsBrainDatabases, FactualGliomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerBrain tumorClassificationDeep learningDetectionMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Segmentation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.