Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39231830›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Artificial intelligence assisted automatic screening of opportunistic osteoporosis in computed tomography images from different scanners.

Yan Wu, Xiaopeng Yang, Mingyue Wang, Yanbang Lian, Ping Hou, Xiangfei Chai, Qiong Dai, Baoxin Qian, Yaojun Jiang, Jianbo Gao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. A comprehensive evaluation of seven osteoporosis screening tools.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yan WuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaopeng YangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Mingyue WangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yanbang LianDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ping HouDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiangfei ChaiDepartment of Scientific Research, Huiying Medical Technology, Beijing, China.
Qiong DaiDepartment of Scientific Research, Huiying Medical Technology, Beijing, China.
Baoxin QianDepartment of Scientific Research, Huiying Medical Technology, Beijing, China.
Yaojun JiangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. jiangyaojun_3526@163.com.
Jianbo GaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. cjr.gaojianbo@vip.163.com.

Funding

This study was supported by the grants from the Special Plan 2022 for Introducing Foreign Intelligence with Henan Province No. HNGD2022033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIt is feasible to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) and detect osteoporosis through an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted system by using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) as a reference without additional radiation exposure or cost.

methodsA deep-learning model developed based on 3312 low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) scans (trained with 2337 and tested with 975) achieved a mean dice similarity coefficient of 95.8% for T1-T12, L1, and L2 vertebral body (VB) segmentation on test data. We performed a model evaluation based on 4401 LDCT scans (obtained from scanners of 3 different manufacturers as external validation data). The BMD values of all individuals were extracted from three consecutive VBs: T12 to L2. Line regression and Bland‒Altman analyses were used to evaluate the overall detection performance. Sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance for normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis patients.

resultsCompared with the QCT results as the diagnostic standard, the BMD assessed had a mean error of (- 0.28, 2.37) mg/cm

conclusionThe developed tool is clinically applicable and helpful for the positioning and analysis of VBs, the measurement of BMD, and the screening of osteopenia and osteoporosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The developed system achieved high accuracy for automatic opportunistic osteoporosis screening using low-dose chest CT scans and performed well on CT images collected from different scanners. KEY POINTS: Osteoporosis is a prevalent but underdiagnosed condition that can increase the risk of fractures. This system could automatically and opportunistically screen for osteoporosis using low-dose chest CT scans obtained for lung cancer screening. The developed system performed well on CT images collected from different scanners and did not differ with patient age or sex.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceOsteoporosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiation DosageRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSensitivity and SpecificityAutomatic screeningBone mineral densityDeep learningOsteopeniaOsteoporosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.