Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39231829›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Generating synthetic high-resolution spinal STIR and T1w images from T2w FSE and low-resolution axial Dixon.

Robert Graf, Paul-Sören Platzek, Evamaria Olga Riedel, Su Hwan Kim, Nicolas Lenhart, Constanze Ramschütz, Karolin Johanna Paprottka, Olivia Ruriko Kertels, Hendrik Kristian Möller, Matan Atad and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Robert GrafDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. robert.graf@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6656-3680
Paul-Sören PlatzekDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Evamaria Olga RiedelDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Su Hwan KimDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nicolas LenhartDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Constanze RamschützDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Karolin Johanna PaprottkaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Olivia Ruriko KertelsDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hendrik Kristian MöllerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Matan AtadDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Robin BülowInstitute for Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Nicole WernerInstitut für Community Medicine, Abteilung SHIP-KEF, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Henry VölzkeInstitut für Community Medicine, Abteilung SHIP-KEF, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Carsten Oliver SchmidtInstitut für Community Medicine, Abteilung SHIP-KEF, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Benedikt WiestlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Johannes C PaetzoldProfessor of Visual Information Processing, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel RueckertInstitut für KI und Informatik in der Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jan Stefan KirschkeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 101045128-iBack-epic-ERC2021-COG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo generate sagittal T1-weighted fast spin echo (T1w FSE) and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) images from sagittal T2-weighted (T2w) FSE and axial T1w gradient echo Dixon technique (T1w-Dixon) sequences. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study used three existing datasets: "Study of Health in Pomerania" (SHIP, 3142 subjects, 1.5 Tesla), "German National Cohort" (NAKO, 2000 subjects, 3 Tesla), and an internal dataset (157 patients 1.5/3 Tesla). We generated synthetic sagittal T1w FSE and STIR images from sagittal T2w FSE and low-resolution axial T1w-Dixon sequences based on two successively applied 3D Pix2Pix deep learning models. "Peak signal-to-noise ratio" (PSNR) and "structural similarity index metric" (SSIM) were used to evaluate the generated image quality on an ablations test. A Turing test, where seven radiologists rated 240 images as either natively acquired or generated, was evaluated using misclassification rate and Fleiss kappa interrater agreement.

resultsIncluding axial T1w-Dixon or T1w FSE images resulted in higher image quality in generated T1w FSE (PSNR = 26.942, SSIM = 0.965) and STIR (PSNR = 28.86, SSIM = 0.948) images compared to using only single T2w images as input (PSNR = 23.076/24.677 SSIM = 0.952/0.928). Radiologists had difficulty identifying generated images (misclassification rate: 0.39 ± 0.09 for T1w FSE, 0.42 ± 0.18 for STIR) and showed low interrater agreement on suspicious images (Fleiss kappa: 0.09 for T1w/STIR).

conclusionsAxial T1w-Dixon and sagittal T2w FSE images contain sufficient information to generate sagittal T1w FSE and STIR images. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: T1w fast spin echo and short tau inversion recovery can be retroactively added to existing datasets, saving MRI time and enabling retrospective analysis, such as evaluating bone marrow pathologies. KEY POINTS: Sagittal T2-weighted images alone were insufficient for differentiating fat and water and to generate T1-weighted images. Axial T1w Dixon technique, together with a T2-weighted sequence, produced realistic sagittal T1-weighted images. Our approach can be used to retrospectively generate STIR and T1-weighted fast spin echo sequences.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpineAdultAgedDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSignal-To-Noise RatioDatabasesDeep learningFactualMagnetic resonance imagingSpine

Identifiers

PMID39231829
PMCPMC11913981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.