ArticleGenome research2024
A best-match approach for gene set analyses in embedding spaces.
Article in Genome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Embedding methods have emerged as a valuable class of approaches for distilling essential information from complex high-dimensional data into more accessible lower-dimensional spaces. Applications of embedding methods to biological data have demonstrated that gene embeddings can effectively capture physical, structural, and functional relationships between genes. However, this utility has been primarily realized by using gene embeddings for downstream machine-learning tasks. Much less has been done to examine the embeddings directly, especially analyses of gene sets in embedding spaces. Here, we propose an Algorithm for Network Data Embedding and Similarity (ANDES), a novel best-match approach that can be used with existing gene embeddings to compare gene sets while reconciling gene set diversity. This intuitive method has important downstream implications for improving the utility of embedding spaces for various tasks. Specifically, we show how ANDES, when applied to different gene embeddings encoding protein-protein interactions, can be used as a novel overrepresentation- and rank-based gene set enrichment analysis method that achieves state-of-the-art performance. Additionally, ANDES can use multiorganism joint gene embeddings to facilitate functional knowledge transfer across organisms, allowing for phenotype mapping across model systems. Our flexible, straightforward best-match methodology can be extended to other embedding spaces with diverse community structures between set elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.