Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39231573›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open quality2024

Lessons learnt from a 2017 Irish national clinical claims review: a retrospective observational study.

Karen A Power, Irene O'Byrne Maguire, Noelle Byrne, Deirdre Walsh, Karen Robinson, Mark McCullagh, Yvonne Fallon, Mary Godfrey, Ann Duffy, Claire O'Regan and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Karen A PowerClinical Risk Unit, State Claims Agency, Dublin, Ireland karen.power@ntma.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6238-4632
Irene O'Byrne MaguireClinical Risk Unit, State Claims Agency, Dublin, Ireland.
Noelle ByrneClinical Risk Unit, State Claims Agency, Dublin, Ireland.
Deirdre WalshClinical Risk Unit, State Claims Agency, Dublin, Ireland.
Karen RobinsonClinical Risk Unit, State Claims Agency, Dublin, Ireland.
Mark McCullaghClinical Risk Unit, State Claims Agency, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5316-3941
Yvonne FallonClinical Risk Unit, State Claims Agency, Dublin, Ireland.
Mary GodfreyClinical Risk Unit, State Claims Agency, Dublin, Ireland.
Ann DuffyClinical Risk Unit, State Claims Agency, Dublin, Ireland.
Claire O'ReganClinical Risk Unit, State Claims Agency, Dublin, Ireland.
Mairead TwohigClinical Risk Unit, State Claims Agency, Dublin, Ireland.
Cathal O'KeeffeClinical Risk Unit, State Claims Agency, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLearning from adverse outcomes in health and social care is critical to advancing a culture of patient safety and reducing the likelihood of future preventable harm to service users. This review aims to present an overview of all clinical claims finalised in one calendar year involving publicly funded health and social care providers in Ireland.

designThis is a retrospective observational study. The Clinical Risk Unit (CRU) of the State Claims Agency identified all service-user clinical claims finalised between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2017 from Ireland's National Incident Management System (n=713). Claims that had incurred financial damages were considered for further analysis (n=356). 202 claims underwent an in-depth qualitative review. Of these, 57 related to maternity and gynaecology, 64 to surgery, 46 to medicine, 20 to community health and social care and 15 related to children's healthcare.

resultsThe services of surgery and medicine ranked first and second, respectively, in terms of a number of claims. Claims in maternity services, despite ranking third in terms of claims numbers, resulted in the highest claims costs. Catastrophic injuries in babies resulting in cerebral palsy or other brain injury accounted for the majority of this cost.Diagnostic errors and inadequate or substandard communication, either with service users and/or interprofessional communication with colleagues, emerged as common issues across all clinical areas analysed. Quantitative analysis of contributory factors demonstrated that the complexity and seriousness of the service user's condition was a significant contributory factor in the occurrence of incidents leading to claims.

conclusionThis national report identifies common issues resulting in claims. Targeting these issues could mitigate patient safety risks and reduce the cost of claims.

Indexed as

Insurance Claim ReviewHumansIrelandRetrospective StudiesAdverse events, epidemiology and detectionDiagnostic errorsHealthcare quality improvementIncident reportingMedical error, measurement/epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID39231573
PMCPMC11409236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.