ArticleBMJ open2024
Caesarean sections, indications and outcomes: a cross-sectional study using the Robson classification in a tertiary hospital in Sierra Leone.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Primary cesarean section in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Robson Ten-Group Classification System.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Caesarean section Robson classification, complications, and lessons learned in a rural hospital in Walikale, North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo: a cross-sectional study.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- The Contribution of AIDA (Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm) to Cesarean Section Within Robson Classification Group.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWHO recommends the use of the Robson's 'Ten Groups Classification' for monitoring and assessing caesarean section (CS) rates. The aim of this study was to investigate the rates, indications and outcomes of CS using Robson classification in a tertiary hospital in Sierra Leone.
designCross-sectional study.
settingPrincess Christian Maternity Hospital (PCMH), Freetown, Sierra Leone.
participantsAll women who gave birth in PCMH from 1 October 2020 to 31 January 2021. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: CS rate by Robson group. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: indications for CS and the newborn outcomes for each Robson group.
results1998 women gave birth during the study period and 992 CS were performed, with a CS rate of 49.6%. Perinatal mortality was 7.8% and maternal mortality accounted for 0.5%. Two-thirds of the women entered labour spontaneously and were considered at low risk (groups 1 and 3). CS rates in these groups were very high (43% group 1 and 33% group 3) with adverse outcomes (perinatal mortality, respectively, 4.1% and 6%). Dystocia was the leading indication for CS accounting for about two-thirds of the CS in groups 1 and 3. Almost all women with a previous CS underwent CS again (95%). The group of women who give birth before term (group 10) represents 5% of the population with high CS rate (50%) mainly because of emergency conditions.
conclusionOur data reveals a notably high CS rate, particularly among low-risk groups according to the Robson classification. Interpretation must consider PCMH as a referral hospital within an extremely low-resourced healthcare system, centralising all the complicated deliveries from a vast catchment area. Further research is required to assess the impact of referred obstetrical complications on the CS rate and the feasibility of implementing measures to improve the management of women with dystocia and previous CS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.