Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39231206›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Regulation of intercellular viscosity by E-cadherin-dependent phosphorylation of EGFR in collective cell migration.

Chaoyu Fu, Florian Dilasser, Shao-Zhen Lin, Marc Karnat, Aditya Arora, Harini Rajendiran, Hui Ting Ong, Nai Mui Hoon Brenda, Sound Wai Phow, Tsuyoshi Hirashima and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. E-Cadherin: A conductor of cellular signaling.Current opinion in cell biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Chaoyu Fu *Mechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411, Singapore.
Florian Dilasser *Mechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411, Singapore.
Shao-Zhen LinAix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, CNRS, Centre de Physique Theorique (UMR 7332), Turing Centre for Living systems, Marseille 13009, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2719-5392
Marc KarnatAix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, CNRS, Centre de Physique Theorique (UMR 7332), Turing Centre for Living systems, Marseille 13009, France.
Aditya AroraMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411, Singapore.
Harini RajendiranMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411, Singapore.
Hui Ting OngMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3434-4683
Nai Mui Hoon BrendaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117583, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2823-1508
Sound Wai PhowMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411, Singapore.
Tsuyoshi HirashimaMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7323-9627
Michael SheetzMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8747-3430
Jean-François RupprechtAix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, CNRS, Centre de Physique Theorique (UMR 7332), Turing Centre for Living systems, Marseille 13009, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8904-5878
Sham TliliAix Marseille Univ, Institut de Biologie du developpement de Marseille (UMR 7288), Turing Centre for Living systems, Marseille 13009, France.
Virgile ViasnoffMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411, Singapore.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) ANR-16-CONV-0001Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) ANR-20-CE30-0023Ministry of Education - Singapore (MOE) MOE2016-T3-1-002National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF) NRFI2018-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collective cell migration is crucial in various physiological processes, including wound healing, morphogenesis, and cancer metastasis. Adherens Junctions (AJs) play a pivotal role in regulating cell cohesion and migration dynamics during tissue remodeling. While the role and origin of the junctional mechanical tension at AJs have been extensively studied, the influence of the actin cortex structure and dynamics on junction plasticity remains incompletely understood. Moreover, the mechanisms underlying stress dissipation at junctions are not well elucidated. Here, we found that the ligand-independent phosphorylation of epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) downstream of de novo E-cadherin adhesion orchestrates a feedback loop, governing intercellular viscosity via the Rac pathway regulating actin dynamics. Our findings highlight how the E-cadherin-dependent EGFR activity controls the migration mode of collective cell movements independently of intercellular tension. This modulation of effective viscosity coordinates cellular movements within the expanding monolayer, inducing a transition from swirling to laminar flow patterns while maintaining a constant migration front speed. Additionally, we propose a vertex model with adjustable junctional viscosity, capable of replicating all observed cellular flow phenotypes experimentally.

Indexed as

CadherinsCell MovementErbB ReceptorsAdherens JunctionsAnimalsHumansPhosphorylationViscosityCadherinsEGFR protein, humanErbB Receptorscollective cell migrationE-cadherin adhesionEGFRintercellular viscosity

Identifiers

PMID39231206
PMCPMC11406304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.