ArticlePloS one2024
Mathematical modeling and numerical simulation of supercritical processing of drug nanoparticles optimization for green processing: AI analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2024-12-19Concerns/Issues about Authorship/Affiliation · Concerns/Issues about Third Party Involvement · Error in Text · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent decades, unfavorable solubility of novel therapeutic agents is considered as an important challenge in pharmaceutical industry. Supercritical carbon dioxide (SCCO2) is known as a green, cost-effective, high-performance, and promising solvent to develop the low solubility of drugs with the aim of enhancing their therapeutic effects. The prominent objective of this study is to improve and modify disparate predictive models through artificial intelligence (AI) to estimate the optimized value of the Oxaprozin solubility in SCCO2 system. In this paper, three different models were selected to develop models on a solubility dataset. Pressure (bar) and temperature (K) are the two inputs for each vector, and each vector has one output (solubility). Selected models include NU-SVM, Linear-SVM, and Decision Tree (DT). Models were optimized through hyper-parameters and assessed applying standard metrics. Considering R-squared metric, NU-SVM, Linear-SVM, and DT have scores of 0.994, 0.854, and 0.950, respectively. Also, they have RMSE error rates of 3.0982E-05, 1.5024E-04, and 1.1680E-04, respectively. Based on the evaluations made, NU-SVM was considered as the most precise method, and optimal values can be summarized as (T = 336.05 K, P = 400.0 bar, solubility = 0.00127) employing this model. Fig 4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.