Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39231154›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

No evidence for population-level benefits of polyandry in sharks and rays.

Joel H Gayford, Estefanía M Flores-Flores

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joel H GayfordDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0839-3940
Estefanía M Flores-FloresShark Measurements, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mating system variation refers to the spectrum between genetic monogamy and polyandry, and has important consequences for sexual conflict, sexual selection and individual fitness in animals. Theoretically this variation could also have substantial population-level effects, influencing population viability and extinction risk. Evidence for these effects is mixed, in part due to the fact that substantial environmental change is thought to be required for them to have visible demographic consequences. In this study we test for the presence of relationships between polyandry and population status in Elasmobranchii (sharks and rays). Elasmobranchii is a large vertebrate clade that exhibits substantial interspecific variation in both genetic mating system and population status, as well as being subject to intense anthropogenically-mediated environmental change. We also predict past macroevolutionary shifts in genetic mating system through elasmobranch phylogeny. Our results show that both genetic monogamy and polyandry have evolved multiple times independently within Elasmobranchii, and we suggest that both of these extremes represent alternative adaptive strategies that are favoured under discrete ecological and biological conditions. Nevertheless, there is no evidence of population-level consequences of mating system variation in elasmobranchs. These results are significant as they suggest that mating system variation in this clade is unlikely to be a major determinant of extinction vulnerability. Ultimately additional work will be required, however this study improves our understanding of the evolutionary dynamics underlying mating system variation in elasmobranchs, and the potential for resultant population-level consequences.

Indexed as

Sexual Behavior, AnimalSharksAnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleMalePhylogenySkates, Fish

Identifiers

PMID39231154
PMCPMC11373851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.