ReviewThe Journal of organic chemistry2024
Photosensitized Oxidative Damage from a New Perspective: The Influence of Before-Light and After-Light Reaction Conditions.
Review in The Journal of organic chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photodynamic anti-biofilm PHEMA/Rose Bengal hydrogels enhanced by iodide: evidence for hydrogen peroxide and triiodide formation.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026Article
- AirborneAdvanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Unveiling the hidden risk of caspofungin: insights from three adverse event reporting systems and network pharmacology integration.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Effect of treatment frequency on the efficacy of superhydrophobic antimicrobial photodynamic therapy of periodontitis in a wistar rat model.Photochemistry and photobiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photooxidative damage is heavily influenced by the presence of bioactive agents. Conversely, bioactive agents influence the local environment, which in turn is perturbed by photooxidative damage. These sorts of processes give rise to a version of the "chicken-and-egg" quandary. In this Perspective, we probe this issue by referring to photooxidative damage in one direction as the light-dark (L-D) sequence and in a second direction as the dark-light (D-L) sequence with a reversed cause and effect. The L-D sequence can lead to the downstream production of reactive molecular species (RMS) in the dark, whereas the D-L sequence can be a pre-irradiation period, such as an additive to limit cellular iron levels to enhance biosynthesized amounts of a protoporphyrin sensitizer. A third direction comes from L-D or D-L sequences, or both simultaneously, which can also be useful for optimizing photodynamics. Photodynamic optimization will benefit from understanding and quantitating unidirectional L-D and D-L pathways, and bidirectional L-D/D-L pathways, for improved control over photooxidative damage. Photooxidative damage, which occurs during anticancer photodynamic therapy (PDT), will be shown to involve RMS. Such RMS include persulfoxides (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.