Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39231093›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Polypharmacy in primary care: A population-based retrospective cohort study of electronic health records.

Thomas Woodcock, Derryn Lovett, Gloria Ihenetu, Vesselin Novov, Thomas Beaney, Keivan Armani, Angela Quilley, Azeem Majeed, Paul Aylin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas WoodcockDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4735-4856
Derryn LovettDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, NIHR ARC Northwest London, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6338-5919
Gloria IhenetuDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Vesselin NovovDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Thomas BeaneyDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Keivan ArmaniDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Angela QuilleyDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, NIHR ARC Northwest London, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Azeem MajeedDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul AylinDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolypharmacy, prescription of multiple medications to a patient, is a major challenge for health systems. There have been no peer-reviewed studies of polypharmacy prevalence and medication cost at a population level in England.

aimsTo determine prevalence and medication cost of polypharmacy, by patient characteristics. Design and setting: Retrospective cohort study of North West London electronic health records.

methodWe quantified prevalence and direct cost of polypharmacy (five or more regular medications), stratified by demographics and frailty. We fitted a mixed-effects logistic regression for polypharmacy.

resultsOf 1.7 million adults, 167,665 (9.4%) were on polypharmacy. Age and socio-economic deprivation were associated with polypharmacy (OR 9.24 95% CI 8.99 to 9.50, age 65-74 compared with 18-44; OR 0.68 95% CI 0.65 to 0.71, least deprived compared with most). Polypharmacy prevalence increased with frailty (OR 1.53 95% CI 1.53 to 1.54 per frailty component, for White women). Men had higher odds of polypharmacy than women at average frailty (OR 1.26 95% CI 1.24 to 1.28) and with additional frailty components (OR 1.10 95% CI 1.09 to 1.10). Black people had lower odds of polypharmacy at average frailty (OR 0.82 95% CI 0.79 to 0.85, compared with White), but along with other ethnicities, saw greater odds increases with increasing frailty (OR 1.02 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03). Annual medication cost 8.2 times more for those on polypharmacy compared with not (£370.89 and £45.31).

conclusionDemographic characteristics are associated with polypharmacy, after adjusting for frailty. Further research should explore why, to reduce health inequities and optimise cost associated with polypharmacy.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPolypharmacyPrimary Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDrug CostsFemaleHumansLondonMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39231093
PMCPMC11373791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.