Trial reportInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Acute Effects of Oral Caffeine Intake on Human Global-Flash mfERG Responses: A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Masked, Balanced Crossover Study.
Trial report in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Childhood Myopia Part II: Treatment Mechanisms, Emerging Options, and Considerations.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the acute effect of caffeine intake on the retinal responses as measured with a global-flash multifocal electroretinogram (gfmERG) protocol at different contrast levels. Methods: Twenty-four young adults (age = 23.3 ± 2.4 years) participated in this placebo-controlled, double-masked, balanced crossover study. On two different days, participants orally ingested caffeine (300 mg) or placebo, and retinal responses were recorded 90 minutes later using a gfmERG at three contrast levels (95%, 50%, and 29%). The amplitude response density and peak time of the direct and induced components (direct component [DC] and induced component [IC], respectively) were extracted for five different eccentricities (1.3°, 5.0°, 9.6°, 15.2°, and 21.9°). Axial length, spherical equivalent refraction, habitual caffeine intake, and body weight were considered as continuous covariates. Results: Increased IC amplitude response density was found after caffeine ingestion in comparison to placebo (P = 0.021, ƞp2 = 0.23), specifically for the 95% and 50% stimulus contrasts (P = 0.024 and 0.018, respectively). This effect of caffeine on IC amplitude response density was independent of the retinal eccentricity (P = 0.556). Caffeine had no effect on DC amplitude response density or DC and IC peak times. Conclusions: Our results show that oral caffeine intake increases the inner electro-retinal activity in young adults when viewing stimuli of high- (95%) to medium-contrast (50%). Given the increasing evidence that the inner retinal function is involved in the emmetropization process, these results may suggest that caffeine or its derivatives could potentially play a role in the mechanisms involved in eye growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.